![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
Mon Dewey!
They're doing a stock review at my university's library. Amongst the class marks up for culling are:
305.3 Gender and also men
305.4 Women including feminism
305.90664 Lesbians and Gay men
Admittedly this has the look of a piecemeal, evolving, much-tinkered-with system, rather than something anybody's thought up from scratch, but even so - who could find in this a satisfactory approximation to reality? John Wilkins would be spinning.
305.3 Gender and also men
305.4 Women including feminism
305.90664 Lesbians and Gay men
Admittedly this has the look of a piecemeal, evolving, much-tinkered-with system, rather than something anybody's thought up from scratch, but even so - who could find in this a satisfactory approximation to reality? John Wilkins would be spinning.
no subject
You know, that never occurred to me about Wittig's statement, and it really should have. Thinky!
no subject
I know! Someone used it as a put-down in an argument with me (Chuh, I've read Wittig in FRENCH, you know, and she meant WIVES), which wasn't the most fun way to find out, but it did make a lightbulb go on over my head...