ext_36709 ([identity profile] steepholm.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] steepholm 2012-01-05 11:08 pm (UTC)

A couple of things I should add, perhaps. It's not that secondary moderns were/are "that bad". They were just never designed to be academic, but to teach practical skills (along with basic numeracy and literacy), that would fit people for manual and low-grade clerical jobs. They simply weren't geared up to get people ready to go to university. (It's because I went to an ex-secondary modern, for example, that I was never taught Latin, much to my regret.)

Secondly - although perhaps this was clear enough - in common parlance no one talks about the tripartite system, even though that's its proper name. It's always known as the "grammar school system".

Post a comment in response:

(will be screened)
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting