ext_36709 ([identity profile] steepholm.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] steepholm 2012-04-01 04:15 pm (UTC)

Quite. Sir Thomas Browne may have been preoccupied with "the fruitless importunity of uroscopy", but there's no reason we should feel obliged to join him.
(10 comments)

Post a comment in response:

(will be screened)
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting
 
Notice: This account is set to log the IP addresses of everyone who comments.
Links will be displayed as unclickable URLs to help prevent spam.