steepholm: (Default)
steepholm ([personal profile] steepholm) wrote2010-07-14 02:53 pm
Entry tags:

"We've Come to Repossess Your Education"

I see that Vince Cable is trying to wriggle round the LibDem opposition to student fees by proposing a tax on graduates. But will this apply only to new graduates, or to existing ones too? And if the latter are to be spared, why - given that most of them got their education for free, and are considerably more able to pay than recent graduates with their average £25K in debt? After all, we're presumably still benefiting from our graduate status - worth some £250,000 to each of us over a lifetime, I seem to remember Margaret Hodge claiming.

It won't happen, though.

[identity profile] steepholm.livejournal.com 2010-07-14 03:44 pm (UTC)(link)
Personally I rather do mind paying, because I think education ought to be free, and that having educated people is a benefit to society rather than something that ought to be taxed. However, if they are going to tax it, I can see no argument for taxing some graduates and not others.
ext_6322: (Pelican)

[identity profile] kalypso-v.livejournal.com 2010-07-14 03:49 pm (UTC)(link)
I agree that education ought to be free, but given that it isn't now and isn't going to be in future, I feel guilty about the fact that it was for me. Well, not really, because I went to a fee-paying secondary school and my mother had to contribute to my maintenance at university, but it was freer than it is now.