steepholm: (Default)
[personal profile] steepholm
I see that Vince Cable is trying to wriggle round the LibDem opposition to student fees by proposing a tax on graduates. But will this apply only to new graduates, or to existing ones too? And if the latter are to be spared, why - given that most of them got their education for free, and are considerably more able to pay than recent graduates with their average £25K in debt? After all, we're presumably still benefiting from our graduate status - worth some £250,000 to each of us over a lifetime, I seem to remember Margaret Hodge claiming.

It won't happen, though.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-07-14 03:44 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] steepholm.livejournal.com
Personally I rather do mind paying, because I think education ought to be free, and that having educated people is a benefit to society rather than something that ought to be taxed. However, if they are going to tax it, I can see no argument for taxing some graduates and not others.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-07-14 03:49 pm (UTC)
ext_6322: (Pelican)
From: [identity profile] kalypso-v.livejournal.com
I agree that education ought to be free, but given that it isn't now and isn't going to be in future, I feel guilty about the fact that it was for me. Well, not really, because I went to a fee-paying secondary school and my mother had to contribute to my maintenance at university, but it was freer than it is now.

Profile

steepholm: (Default)
steepholm

April 2025

S M T W T F S
  12 3 45
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags