steepholm: (Default)
[personal profile] steepholm
I see that Vince Cable is trying to wriggle round the LibDem opposition to student fees by proposing a tax on graduates. But will this apply only to new graduates, or to existing ones too? And if the latter are to be spared, why - given that most of them got their education for free, and are considerably more able to pay than recent graduates with their average £25K in debt? After all, we're presumably still benefiting from our graduate status - worth some £250,000 to each of us over a lifetime, I seem to remember Margaret Hodge claiming.

It won't happen, though.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-07-14 01:54 pm (UTC)
ext_6322: (Pelican)
From: [identity profile] kalypso-v.livejournal.com
I wouldn't mind paying. Thousands would.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-07-14 02:26 pm (UTC)
sheenaghpugh: (Do somethin' else!)
From: [personal profile] sheenaghpugh
I know graduates who, because they chose to go into ill-paid professions, have never earned more than about £20,000 - is he saying they have to pay an extra tax on that when Alan Sugar can keep all his?

(no subject)

Date: 2010-07-14 03:43 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] steepholm.livejournal.com
Yes indeedy - once they reach a certain level of income.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-07-14 03:44 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] steepholm.livejournal.com
Personally I rather do mind paying, because I think education ought to be free, and that having educated people is a benefit to society rather than something that ought to be taxed. However, if they are going to tax it, I can see no argument for taxing some graduates and not others.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-07-14 03:49 pm (UTC)
ext_6322: (Pelican)
From: [identity profile] kalypso-v.livejournal.com
I agree that education ought to be free, but given that it isn't now and isn't going to be in future, I feel guilty about the fact that it was for me. Well, not really, because I went to a fee-paying secondary school and my mother had to contribute to my maintenance at university, but it was freer than it is now.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-07-14 04:37 pm (UTC)
ext_12745: (Default)
From: [identity profile] lamentables.livejournal.com
Extra earning potential = extra income tax-paying potential
Everybody wins.
*headdesk*

(no subject)

Date: 2010-07-14 04:45 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] steepholm.livejournal.com
Well, quite. See posts passim for my plaintive pleas for a rise in income tax as the fairest and simplest mechanism to raise extra revenue. It continues to be mentioned by nobody from the main parties, as far as I can see.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-07-14 04:51 pm (UTC)
ext_12745: (Default)
From: [identity profile] lamentables.livejournal.com
Oh, I know you know that, I just had to say it out loud.
Obviously the anti-VAT rant I delivered in person this morning did not get my tax-related frustrations out of the system.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-07-15 06:10 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] emmaco.livejournal.com
No mention of past graduates paying so far. So very unfair that the generation with free uni education, cheaper housing and good pensions also skip this tax...

(no subject)

Date: 2010-07-16 10:05 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] steepholm.livejournal.com
Can it be a coincidence that they are also the ones drafting the laws?

Profile

steepholm: (Default)
steepholm

April 2025

S M T W T F S
  12 3 45
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags