steepholm: (Default)
steepholm ([personal profile] steepholm) wrote2010-07-14 02:53 pm
Entry tags:

"We've Come to Repossess Your Education"

I see that Vince Cable is trying to wriggle round the LibDem opposition to student fees by proposing a tax on graduates. But will this apply only to new graduates, or to existing ones too? And if the latter are to be spared, why - given that most of them got their education for free, and are considerably more able to pay than recent graduates with their average £25K in debt? After all, we're presumably still benefiting from our graduate status - worth some £250,000 to each of us over a lifetime, I seem to remember Margaret Hodge claiming.

It won't happen, though.
ext_6322: (Pelican)

[identity profile] kalypso-v.livejournal.com 2010-07-14 01:54 pm (UTC)(link)
I wouldn't mind paying. Thousands would.
sheenaghpugh: (Do somethin' else!)

[personal profile] sheenaghpugh 2010-07-14 02:26 pm (UTC)(link)
I know graduates who, because they chose to go into ill-paid professions, have never earned more than about £20,000 - is he saying they have to pay an extra tax on that when Alan Sugar can keep all his?

[identity profile] steepholm.livejournal.com 2010-07-14 03:43 pm (UTC)(link)
Yes indeedy - once they reach a certain level of income.

[identity profile] steepholm.livejournal.com 2010-07-14 03:44 pm (UTC)(link)
Personally I rather do mind paying, because I think education ought to be free, and that having educated people is a benefit to society rather than something that ought to be taxed. However, if they are going to tax it, I can see no argument for taxing some graduates and not others.
ext_6322: (Pelican)

[identity profile] kalypso-v.livejournal.com 2010-07-14 03:49 pm (UTC)(link)
I agree that education ought to be free, but given that it isn't now and isn't going to be in future, I feel guilty about the fact that it was for me. Well, not really, because I went to a fee-paying secondary school and my mother had to contribute to my maintenance at university, but it was freer than it is now.
ext_12745: (Default)

[identity profile] lamentables.livejournal.com 2010-07-14 04:37 pm (UTC)(link)
Extra earning potential = extra income tax-paying potential
Everybody wins.
*headdesk*

[identity profile] steepholm.livejournal.com 2010-07-14 04:45 pm (UTC)(link)
Well, quite. See posts passim for my plaintive pleas for a rise in income tax as the fairest and simplest mechanism to raise extra revenue. It continues to be mentioned by nobody from the main parties, as far as I can see.
ext_12745: (Default)

[identity profile] lamentables.livejournal.com 2010-07-14 04:51 pm (UTC)(link)
Oh, I know you know that, I just had to say it out loud.
Obviously the anti-VAT rant I delivered in person this morning did not get my tax-related frustrations out of the system.

[identity profile] emmaco.livejournal.com 2010-07-15 06:10 pm (UTC)(link)
No mention of past graduates paying so far. So very unfair that the generation with free uni education, cheaper housing and good pensions also skip this tax...

[identity profile] steepholm.livejournal.com 2010-07-16 10:05 am (UTC)(link)
Can it be a coincidence that they are also the ones drafting the laws?