Green Man's reviewing policy for YA books
Mar. 29th, 2007 10:40 pmAnyone who reads the Green Man Review’s website will find that it makes some pretty strong claims for its influence - in terms of reach (‘It's far more likely than not that a Green Man will be ranked at the top of a search… We reach a quarter of a million or so unique readers every month’); longevity (‘A review or interview on Green Man reaches readers everywhere -- be it right now or decades from now’); and authoritativeness (‘If we say it's good, you know it's bloody good!’).
With this awesome power comes responsibility, however, and seeing that the same site invites readers’ letters,
lady_schrapnell wrote to them recently, detailing some of the problems with their recent review of Death of a Ghost (you can read her original post on the subject here). The reply, which came from a senior staffer but may seem by its choice of pronoun to speak for the GMR as a whole, provides an instructive insight into the journal's YA reviewing policy... ( More behind the cut )
With this awesome power comes responsibility, however, and seeing that the same site invites readers’ letters,
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)