pt 1) Now you're changing the bar from "exclusionary" to "discriminatory." It is discriminatory, but that's not the barrier we were talking about earlier.
pt 2) It is indeed precisely the opposite of the argument I employed earlier. But it's the argument that you used that convinced you, so I thought it fair to turn it on you.
Again, the point isn't that the single people are excluded. They are, and that's undisputed. The point - the whole point - of the original discussion is the basis on which the included people are included.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
(no subject)
Date: 2015-06-29 09:59 pm (UTC)pt 2) It is indeed precisely the opposite of the argument I employed earlier. But it's the argument that you used that convinced you, so I thought it fair to turn it on you.
Again, the point isn't that the single people are excluded. They are, and that's undisputed. The point - the whole point - of the original discussion is the basis on which the included people are included.