Life by the Slice
Jun. 27th, 2010 12:20 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Hearing the sad news of Alan Plater's death reminded me of some thoughts I had in Bolton about my relationship with writing from, and about, northern England.
Bolton, as my host pointed out to me, was the long-term home of Bill Naughton, a less celebrated writer than Plater, and perhaps best known today for having written the play on which the Michael Caine film Alfie was based. For schoolchildren of my generation, though, he was more familiar for his collection The Goalkeeper's Revenge - a series of gritty tales of northern working-class lads with names like Spit Nolan. Along with the books (and subsequent films) of Alan Sillitoe, Barry Hines, Keith Waterhouse and Stan Barstow, and the dramas broadcast on Play for Today through the 1970s, these gave me a strong cumulative sense of The North as a place as mythical as the Wild West - a world of manual labour, frothy beer and short vowels, tea and hardship, pits and cotton mills (depending which side of the Pennines you were on).* By the time I actually came to see Lancashire the mills had all been converted to museums and apartments (c.f. that episode of Life on Mars), which added to my sense of it as a kind of storybook world. As for the pits - well, I actually lived in Yorkshire throughout the miners' strike, but in York itself, which perhaps doesn't count. I never saw a miner, to my knowledge, and it wasn't until I came to Bristol that I found myself living in what had been an actual mining area. It's not that Yorkshire felt like a museum, exactly - and Doncaster in particular seemed to be full of scary people, to judge by the ones who got on and off the train there, who oozed a kind of violent northernness that I didn't know how to cope with - but neither did it have much in common with the malnourished, black-and-white world of Kes.
Now I look into it, I see that the stories in The Goalkeeper's Revenge are actually all set in the 1930s. Did I notice that when I read them at school? I don't remember doing so, which is perhaps telling. Mythological places have no chronological time, after all. In fact, I suppose that my attitude to the North (or perhaps the way in which it was used by my teachers) amounted to a kind of orientalism - or borealism, maybe - to which historical change, or indeed flesh-and-blood northerners, were fairly incidental. The point was that the idea of the North encapsulated certain qualities valued by those who selected the books we were to study: the qualities of a life unwarped by capitalist greed - honest and communitarian. Personally I found it all pretty unappealing.
The irony is that these stories were fed to us as slices of Real Life. Being Real was a significant part of their function, in fact. Indeed, I came away with the impression that the black-and-white life of the North was considerably more Real than my own lower-middle-class life in a Hampshire market town, and also that the working class children I knew at school weren't as truly working class as northern kids, because their dads worked on farms and at the brewery rather than down a mine. What was intended as a lesson in what Real Life was like, had the ironic effect of making both the North and my own environment seem slightly less real, in different ways.
* Writing this I've become conscious for the first time that I see Lancashire as a female county, and Yorkshire as a male one. I wonder why? Perhaps it's to do with their positions on the map. Lancashire is on the distaff side of England, and its identity is appropriately bound up with textiles, while Yorkshire is associated (in my mind at least) with coal and steel, spear-side trades of delving and cutting. Then again, the Lancashire accent (outside Manchester at least) has much more pitch variation, which is generally the case with women vis-a-vis men. I don't know - does anyone else make this assocation?

Bolton, as my host pointed out to me, was the long-term home of Bill Naughton, a less celebrated writer than Plater, and perhaps best known today for having written the play on which the Michael Caine film Alfie was based. For schoolchildren of my generation, though, he was more familiar for his collection The Goalkeeper's Revenge - a series of gritty tales of northern working-class lads with names like Spit Nolan. Along with the books (and subsequent films) of Alan Sillitoe, Barry Hines, Keith Waterhouse and Stan Barstow, and the dramas broadcast on Play for Today through the 1970s, these gave me a strong cumulative sense of The North as a place as mythical as the Wild West - a world of manual labour, frothy beer and short vowels, tea and hardship, pits and cotton mills (depending which side of the Pennines you were on).* By the time I actually came to see Lancashire the mills had all been converted to museums and apartments (c.f. that episode of Life on Mars), which added to my sense of it as a kind of storybook world. As for the pits - well, I actually lived in Yorkshire throughout the miners' strike, but in York itself, which perhaps doesn't count. I never saw a miner, to my knowledge, and it wasn't until I came to Bristol that I found myself living in what had been an actual mining area. It's not that Yorkshire felt like a museum, exactly - and Doncaster in particular seemed to be full of scary people, to judge by the ones who got on and off the train there, who oozed a kind of violent northernness that I didn't know how to cope with - but neither did it have much in common with the malnourished, black-and-white world of Kes.
Now I look into it, I see that the stories in The Goalkeeper's Revenge are actually all set in the 1930s. Did I notice that when I read them at school? I don't remember doing so, which is perhaps telling. Mythological places have no chronological time, after all. In fact, I suppose that my attitude to the North (or perhaps the way in which it was used by my teachers) amounted to a kind of orientalism - or borealism, maybe - to which historical change, or indeed flesh-and-blood northerners, were fairly incidental. The point was that the idea of the North encapsulated certain qualities valued by those who selected the books we were to study: the qualities of a life unwarped by capitalist greed - honest and communitarian. Personally I found it all pretty unappealing.
The irony is that these stories were fed to us as slices of Real Life. Being Real was a significant part of their function, in fact. Indeed, I came away with the impression that the black-and-white life of the North was considerably more Real than my own lower-middle-class life in a Hampshire market town, and also that the working class children I knew at school weren't as truly working class as northern kids, because their dads worked on farms and at the brewery rather than down a mine. What was intended as a lesson in what Real Life was like, had the ironic effect of making both the North and my own environment seem slightly less real, in different ways.
* Writing this I've become conscious for the first time that I see Lancashire as a female county, and Yorkshire as a male one. I wonder why? Perhaps it's to do with their positions on the map. Lancashire is on the distaff side of England, and its identity is appropriately bound up with textiles, while Yorkshire is associated (in my mind at least) with coal and steel, spear-side trades of delving and cutting. Then again, the Lancashire accent (outside Manchester at least) has much more pitch variation, which is generally the case with women vis-a-vis men. I don't know - does anyone else make this assocation?

(no subject)
Date: 2010-06-27 08:27 am (UTC)Trevor lived in a mining district - i.e. Midsomer Norton. I know exactly what you mean about the north seeming more 'real' - it's a British thing of working class life being in some sense idealised, the reverse of the pastoral but somehow related to the mechanism that drives the pastoral, if that makes any sense. Idealisation, I guess is what I'm getting at.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-06-27 01:40 pm (UTC)Until yesterday I would probably have disagreed about Bristol being a particularly violent city, but having just witnessed a woman more or less being throttled by a car-park-rage stranger at Tesco's, I'll just nod and move on!
(no subject)
Date: 2010-06-27 09:14 pm (UTC)OTOH someone got badly glassed in Glastonbury y'day, so we rural/alternative types can't talk.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-06-27 09:46 am (UTC)As it happens, my husband is from Doncaster and thus we personify your EW Male/Female divide. :) There could be something in it, actually. I do associate Yorkshire with a more macho image. Over in Lancashire, women could work in the mills and though the work was hard and the hours long, once work was finished, they were their own person with a wage to spend how they liked, unlike the girls who were in service and scarcely got any time to call their own and were at the mercy of the family they lived with. Thus I tend to see women in Lancashire as more assertive because since even before my grandmother's generation, they've had more choice than a woman living in a rural area or where the only industry is heavy industry.
Of course Lancashire had plenty of mines and factories too. My great-grandfather left the land and moved to Manchester to be a miner because the wages were so much better. My maternal grandfather worked for Avro who build aircaft like the Lancaster and Vulcan bombers. My dad started his working life with ICI (who had both chemicals and dyestuffs divisions).
(no subject)
Date: 2010-06-27 01:44 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-06-28 02:48 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-06-27 10:07 am (UTC)Certainly the miners' strike was very immediate here, and I bitterly resented its treatment in Billy Elliott - I may well use your word 'borealism' to describe the sense of 'appropriation' it gives me.
Good point about the selective nature of 'realism', too.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-06-27 01:46 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-06-27 02:18 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-06-28 12:47 pm (UTC)And I think of Yorkshire as built on wool.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-06-27 11:09 am (UTC)It was a very brief period- the period of the mines and the mills. I guess it lasted about 150 years. Now that its detritus has been largely cleared away you are more likely to notice the remnants of the culture it replaced- the stone built 17th century farm houses, the modest 18th century Wesleyan chapels...
I'm too up close to the culture of the contemporary north to really figure what it's all about. It's still in the making I guess- and by the time it's sufficiently well fixed in our minds for us to memorialise it, it will already have turned into history.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-06-27 01:52 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-06-27 03:20 pm (UTC)I have taught
The North, like the South, is always much more complicated than you think. I'm a Midlander, and nobody has much in the way of preconceptions or expectations of us beyond a Brummie accent. Northerners hear me as "posh", southerners as "Northern" very often. When you look at Yorkshire you realise that it's full of affluent enclaves - not just York, but Harrogate, Beverley, many of the coastal towns like Scarborough and Whitby - as well as several quite distinctively different types of industrial or post-industrial area - Bradford and the Woollen District (J B Priestly territory) are very different to Doncaster, and Sheffield is different again. The thing I always notice about Yorkshire is the suddenness of the transitions, too - from Bradford to Haworth, for example. Lancashire is smaller but has a similar mix - Lancaster is a total contrast to Rochdale for example.
Mrs Gaskell got something of the feel of this a century and a half ago, of course, in
(no subject)
Date: 2010-06-28 02:43 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-06-28 03:29 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-06-27 09:58 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-06-27 10:04 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-06-28 02:34 pm (UTC)We read The Goalkeeper's Revenge at school too. I must have realised it wasn't set "now", if only because of the money, but I don't think I thought of it as quite as long ago as the 1930s. But then I didn't pick up on settings very well at that age; when I first read What Katy Did, aged 6 or 7, I was convinced it was set in England.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-06-28 02:46 pm (UTC)That seems entirely reasonable. Any differences could easily be attributed to its being the Old Days. By contrast, I just marked a student dissertation that asserted several times that it was set in Canada. I can only assume the author confused Katy with Anne of Green Gables, but dear me!