Conguito Conundrum
Nov. 15th, 2011 08:03 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
When I was young, I owned a golliwog. I don't believe I realized it was a stylized representation of a black minstrel, for that wasn't a cultural reference point I possessed. I did of course recognize him from the jars of Robertson's jam, though, and sent off for the little enamel badges, of golliwogs engaged in various activities. We collected them on the kitchen sill.
I had barely seen any black people at that time. I remember looking at what I now realise were some small black children in an American picture book, and because they had short tight braids that reminded me of nothing so much as the antennae sported by cartoon aliens, vaguely associated them with other planets. Oh yes, and like everyone I knew, I picked who was going to be "it" in games by using a rhyme mostly composed of nonsense words such as "eeny", "meeny, "miny", "mo", "nigger" and "hollers". I'd heard none of these used in any other connection. (I wonder how that rhyme made it across the Atlantic, and when?)
That was all in about 1970. Some eighteen years later, things had changed. I was shocked when I stayed in a shared postgraduate student house in Cambridge, and found in the bathroom a tube of "Darkie" toothpaste. It turned out one of the students in the house was Malaysian, where this is - or was, before they renamed it "Darlie" - a popular brand. Perhaps in Malaysia they lacked the cultural reference point too?
That was all in about 1988. More than twenty years later - last week, in fact - my PhD student (who's working on Captain Underpants, and don't you wish you were too?) told me about the Spanish equivalent of M&Ms. They're called Conguitos (i.e. Congolese people), and they advertise them like this:
What I didn't know in a small market town in 1970, and the Malaysians weren't much aware of in 1988, it's very hard to believe that the Spanish - just a Herculean pillar's caber toss from Africa - are ignorant of today. Conguitos aren't particularly controversial, though, it seems.
I'm not sure what to make of it. Easy to call the advert racist (well, duh), but I'd feel a lot more outraged if it appeared on, say, UK TV, because I'm more certain of the context here. But then, how far does something's being racist depend on a "context"? But then, do I really think my younger self was racist for using the word "nigger" without having any idea what it meant? But then, wouldn't it be a different kind of racism to "make allowances" for the Spanish lagging a few years behind us Anglophones?
I had barely seen any black people at that time. I remember looking at what I now realise were some small black children in an American picture book, and because they had short tight braids that reminded me of nothing so much as the antennae sported by cartoon aliens, vaguely associated them with other planets. Oh yes, and like everyone I knew, I picked who was going to be "it" in games by using a rhyme mostly composed of nonsense words such as "eeny", "meeny, "miny", "mo", "nigger" and "hollers". I'd heard none of these used in any other connection. (I wonder how that rhyme made it across the Atlantic, and when?)
That was all in about 1970. Some eighteen years later, things had changed. I was shocked when I stayed in a shared postgraduate student house in Cambridge, and found in the bathroom a tube of "Darkie" toothpaste. It turned out one of the students in the house was Malaysian, where this is - or was, before they renamed it "Darlie" - a popular brand. Perhaps in Malaysia they lacked the cultural reference point too?
That was all in about 1988. More than twenty years later - last week, in fact - my PhD student (who's working on Captain Underpants, and don't you wish you were too?) told me about the Spanish equivalent of M&Ms. They're called Conguitos (i.e. Congolese people), and they advertise them like this:
What I didn't know in a small market town in 1970, and the Malaysians weren't much aware of in 1988, it's very hard to believe that the Spanish - just a Herculean pillar's caber toss from Africa - are ignorant of today. Conguitos aren't particularly controversial, though, it seems.
I'm not sure what to make of it. Easy to call the advert racist (well, duh), but I'd feel a lot more outraged if it appeared on, say, UK TV, because I'm more certain of the context here. But then, how far does something's being racist depend on a "context"? But then, do I really think my younger self was racist for using the word "nigger" without having any idea what it meant? But then, wouldn't it be a different kind of racism to "make allowances" for the Spanish lagging a few years behind us Anglophones?
(no subject)
Date: 2011-11-15 08:16 am (UTC)I know what you mean about childhood racism due to a lack of referents. It took me until 21 to really get a clue- my first serious BF was from what was then Rhodesia and that, shall we say, created interesting issues for us both (or rather for some of the people we ran across in our daily lives, even in a liberal middle class university town like Canterbury) even as little a time ago as the late seventies early eighties.
(no subject)
Date: 2011-11-15 08:37 am (UTC)I don't think the important part of that is whether the child can be called racist personally; I think the important part is how the racism seeps into our pores from our culture, and how the racism uses (though that sounds a bit too agent-y) kids to reinscribe and recycle the racism back out into society.
(no subject)
Date: 2011-11-15 08:37 am (UTC)Which reminds me that I saw this last week.
(no subject)
Date: 2011-11-15 01:15 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-11-27 12:08 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-11-15 09:25 am (UTC)Context is a difficult and slippery thing, but there was absolutely no question of mocking anyone and the songs were performed perfectly seriously to the best of our ability. The occasional non-white person was still a novelty then, not a threat, so I wouldn't say that we were even aware of the possibility of being racist when the issues we were concerned with at the time were about class, religion (there was a certain amount of anti-Catholic feeling from some quarters) and whether you supported Manchester United or City (which could also possibly be classified under religion!).
(no subject)
Date: 2011-11-15 09:31 am (UTC)I was in a shop with my 11-year-old and they were selling handmade golliwogs... Mark and I were discussing them (his reaction was "that thing is so scary looking"). The shopkeeper overheard us and told us we weren't allowed to use the word golliwog - it was correctly termed a "golly" and they were handmade for him by some woman in Australia. (WTF)
After some probing it emerged that the derogatory racial slur we weren't allowed to make reference to was the word "wog" (which really threw me off since my understanding is that "wog" and "nigger" are pejorative terms for completely different races, and the so-called "golly" was clearly, to me, making racial reference to the latter). It seems weird to me to make a stink about associations that no one realises are there. But maybe the "wog" part of the word is there on purpose, historically or etymologically or something; therefore saying "golliwog" is like saying "nigger" when you don't know what it means.
What is my kid supposed to learn from this experience? That it's okay for people to make grotesque blackface dolls and sell them commercially as collectibles, not not ok for us to refer to those dolls by their traditional name? By extension does that make blackface ok as long as you don't actually talk about it?
blah.
(no subject)
Date: 2011-11-15 09:55 am (UTC)Nobody does the Black and White minstrels any more. Perhaps British women should protest at Little Britain doing the "but I am a LADEEEE" sketches. Or perhaps transgender people should object, I'm not quite sure who David Walliams is sending up.
(no subject)
Date: 2011-11-15 10:47 am (UTC)I actually find Timmy the Sheep to be quite objectionable on the same grounds as the golliwogs, but I seem to be alone in that.
(no subject)
Date: 2011-11-15 11:43 am (UTC)And I'm afraid that's how the likes of the BBC continue to feel that trans people are fair game- especially as the so called 'human rights' act actually removed protections we had previously been afforded by the gender recognition act. 'We didn't mean anything nasty by it' cuts no ice with me and believe me, I know- I've been there.
If you don't think it's right to abuse people of colour, Jews Muslims, Roma people (and with both Jewish and Roma ancestry, do I ever have a full set!) or gay and lesbian folk, it can't be right to abuse and mock trans folk.
Sadly, an awful lot of people seem incapable of getting this........
(no subject)
Date: 2011-11-15 12:18 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-11-15 01:58 pm (UTC)The people who get the hardest time are those who can't do the first (like there are no other homely women in the world) and are therefore denied the choice of the second (although I'm fully supportive of those who choose to be 'out'- while all I ever wanted to be 'out' as was myself :o) by a hate filled media and sections of society.
(no subject)
Date: 2011-11-15 03:04 pm (UTC)people are generally afraid of things they don't understand, I think, and the fear gets manifested as hatred.
(no subject)
Date: 2011-11-15 10:53 am (UTC)Not sure whether they're still current, but they were around about ten years ago, because they performed in my mother's town. She was on the council at the time, and reported that they asked in advance whether the locals would prefer them not to black up. The first councillor to speak said "We're not bothered by that sort of thing, are we?"; she was quite surprised when my mother said that she was. So they didn't black up in Grange, but evidently they did in some venues.
(no subject)
Date: 2011-11-15 11:53 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-11-15 12:14 pm (UTC)We've been watching "Vous les Femmes" as our late-night comedy and it's so refreshing to watch a show that makes you laugh without making you wince and cringe (or have to look away because of the projectile vomiting, another Little Britain act that I find bewilderingly AWFUL)
(no subject)
Date: 2011-11-15 09:52 am (UTC)I believe our society has come a long long way in the last 50 years with regard to race, LGBT equality, and women's rights. If I ever doubt that society is progressing, I think of the last time I saw a golliwog, which was some time ago. Also, Stephen Lawrence's alleged murderers are back in court this week. A lot of people have never given up trying to stamp out the incipient racism in the British police. That makes me happy.
(no subject)
Date: 2011-11-15 10:00 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-11-15 11:56 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-11-15 11:49 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-11-15 11:54 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-11-15 12:05 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-11-15 12:23 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-11-15 12:32 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-11-15 12:33 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-11-15 12:34 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-11-15 01:49 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-11-15 01:07 pm (UTC)Interesting it was already "tiger" that early, at least in places with a large black population. I suppose that word was picked on because it sounds vaguely similar, but I also wonder whether there's a Little Black Sambo echo there.
(no subject)
Date: 2011-11-15 01:28 pm (UTC)The Knapps attribute the origin to the "Anglo-Cymric" counting system, which the Wikipedia entry on "eeny meeny miny mo" touches on a bit (though not referencing the same sources as Knapp - however it is easier for me to point you to Wikipedia than to spam your blog with another page of text)! Wikipedia also says that 'Common variations, particularly in United Kingdom, substitute "tinker", "tigger" or "chicken" for tiger and use "squeals" rather than hollers.'
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eeny,_meeny,_miny,_moe
The Wikipedia link is actually very extensive and seems reasonably well researched, and includes a brief discussion of the 'controversial version':
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eeny,_meeny,_miny,_moe#Controversial_version
(no subject)
Date: 2011-11-15 01:37 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-11-15 02:01 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-11-17 09:09 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-11-15 04:28 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-11-27 12:11 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-11-15 02:10 pm (UTC)It is somewhat ironic that the 'rude' version we chanted as children is now much less offensive than the 'correct' version of the time. (Though we said 'screams' not 'hollers' because that word wasn't in our vocabulary.)
(no subject)
Date: 2011-11-15 01:57 pm (UTC)And I remember that my mother had enough black and Asian colleagues that for a long time I assumed anyone who wasn't white must be a doctor. I don't know whether this was racist or just clueless.
(no subject)
Date: 2011-11-15 03:06 pm (UTC)http://ohmydolls.com/dolls%20for%20library/talkingtamu.html
I *loved* this doll.
(no subject)
Date: 2011-11-15 04:28 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-11-15 04:08 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-11-15 04:16 pm (UTC)Christie, Congo, Golly.
Date: 2011-11-15 04:46 pm (UTC)