Who can Play?
Sep. 9th, 2012 01:12 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
The "Who can play what kind of role?" question is, I suppose, a cousin of the "Who can write about what sort of experience?" question that crops up on LJ fairly regularly. But does it get the same answers? And are the answers internally consistent anyway? I suspect that neither is the case.
The following is no more than a brief mental tally based on my own viewing experience rather than facts and figures, and since I'm by no means the biggest film or TV watcher out there, I'm very open to correction. (I'm putting theatre to one side, as I have a feeling the answers may be significantly different there because of the history of the genre.)
Are women played by women? Pretty much 100% of the time.
Are black people played by black people? Pretty much 100% of the time (and the same goes for other racial groups, although not nationalities).
Are working class people played by working class people? Often, but by no means invariably.
Are gay people played by gay people? Sometimes, but by no means invariably.
Are trans people played by trans people? Very occasionally, but never in major roles and often for the purposes of fetishistic transploitation.
Are wheelchair users played by wheelchair users? Increasingly so, but I would guess still less than half the time.
Are blind people played by blind people? I actually have no idea how often this happens.
Are dwarfs played by dwarfs? Sometimes, but see the caveat for trans people above.
Are people with Down's Syndrome played by people with Down's Syndrome. Invariably, I think.
Obviously other categrories could be added, but even getting this far makes me aware of a) how little I actually know about casting practices, and b) the wide and puzzling variations within the list. Why is it unthinkable to have a character with Down's played by anyone other than an actor with Down's, but perfectly thinkable to do this with blind people or wheelchair users, for example? Fairly common to have gay characters played by gay actors, but almost unheard of to have trans characters played by trans actors? Is there any rationale at all here? Or is the landscape as confused as it looks at first glance?
The following is no more than a brief mental tally based on my own viewing experience rather than facts and figures, and since I'm by no means the biggest film or TV watcher out there, I'm very open to correction. (I'm putting theatre to one side, as I have a feeling the answers may be significantly different there because of the history of the genre.)
Are women played by women? Pretty much 100% of the time.
Are black people played by black people? Pretty much 100% of the time (and the same goes for other racial groups, although not nationalities).
Are working class people played by working class people? Often, but by no means invariably.
Are gay people played by gay people? Sometimes, but by no means invariably.
Are trans people played by trans people? Very occasionally, but never in major roles and often for the purposes of fetishistic transploitation.
Are wheelchair users played by wheelchair users? Increasingly so, but I would guess still less than half the time.
Are blind people played by blind people? I actually have no idea how often this happens.
Are dwarfs played by dwarfs? Sometimes, but see the caveat for trans people above.
Are people with Down's Syndrome played by people with Down's Syndrome. Invariably, I think.
Obviously other categrories could be added, but even getting this far makes me aware of a) how little I actually know about casting practices, and b) the wide and puzzling variations within the list. Why is it unthinkable to have a character with Down's played by anyone other than an actor with Down's, but perfectly thinkable to do this with blind people or wheelchair users, for example? Fairly common to have gay characters played by gay actors, but almost unheard of to have trans characters played by trans actors? Is there any rationale at all here? Or is the landscape as confused as it looks at first glance?
(no subject)
Date: 2012-09-09 09:27 pm (UTC)Are blind people played by blind people? Ditto.
Are dwarfs played by dwarfs? The most offensive part for little people is how often they're played by CGI non-little people actors, as if little people == special effects.
In the US, there seems to be an assumption that "light brown" is a generic pool, so Indians play Latinos play Israelis play very tanned people play Egyptians.
(no subject)
Date: 2012-09-09 02:13 pm (UTC)It gets even more complicated if the actor has to portray having a disability and being able-bodied, for example if there are flashback scenes showing the character before the accident or illness that caused the disability.
(no subject)
Date: 2012-09-09 02:14 pm (UTC)More than there are roles for trans characters!
(no subject)
Date: 2012-09-09 02:25 pm (UTC)Of course there is also the point that actors usually go into acting in order to be someone other than themselves. In a recent episode of Accused, Sean Bean played a transvestite. Now I don't have the experience to judge whether he made a convincing job of it, but I bet he absolutely loved the role because it was so different to most of the stuff he gets.
(no subject)
Date: 2012-09-09 02:38 pm (UTC)You're right of course, that there aren't many trans roles, and we can cut that number in half again, at least, if we subtract the ones where the character is a serial killer or a murder victim.
(no subject)
Date: 2012-09-09 02:57 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2012-09-09 03:02 pm (UTC)Otherwise, the exception I made about discussing theatre extends to opera. It's not that there's nothing relevant to say about these forms, but that their long history, particularly of cross-gender roles and of genres such as pantomime that depend on such roles, complicates the issues. For the purpose of this post I want to keep things as simple as a complicated world will permit.
(no subject)
Date: 2012-09-09 04:07 pm (UTC)The only example I know off the top of my head is Esmond Knight, and he'd been acting professionally for fifteen years before he was blinded: he was returning disabled, not starting his career from scratch. To the best of my knowledge, though, he never played a blind role.
(no subject)
Date: 2012-09-09 04:16 pm (UTC)Of course radio opens up all kinds of possibilities, and I do hear actors I know to be non-white in white roles there.
(no subject)
Date: 2012-09-09 06:46 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2012-09-09 02:13 pm (UTC)I don't think this is true, eg Naveen Andrews (a British Indian actor) played the Iraqi character Sayid Jarrah on Lost, Anil Kapoor (an Indian actor) played a Middle Eastern terrorist on 24, Angelina Jolie played the Afro-Chinese-Cuban-Dutch Mariane Pearl, etc, etc. I have no idea of the statistics, but it's certainly nowhere near 100%, even when you discount 'racebending' (rewriting non-white characters as white in movie adaptations, as with the originally Filipino lead of Starship Troopers, the main characters in The Last Airbender, etc).
The rationale is fairly clear: it's a mixture of cultural fantasies about which identities are the most indelibly inscribed on the body and/or which characteristics are 'visible' (we're very invested in thinking that no-one could ever 'read' a non-Down syndrome person as having Down syndrome; most non-wheelchair users don't have the skills to 'read' whether an actor is using a wheelchair convincingly; most gay people and working-class people do not believe that sexuality and/or class are legible on the body), and the length of time that any particular minority group has been objecting to discriminatory casting practices. Black and minority ethnic actors have been objecting to losing the (very few) roles available to them for decades (and, as I say, they haven't got all that far yet); as far as I know, trans actors have only been organizing about this for a few years.
, and the length of time that a particular
(no subject)
Date: 2012-09-09 02:33 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2012-09-09 03:57 pm (UTC)And it's vanishingly rare to see an Arab character played by an Arab actor. Particularly if they're positive characters. This worries me.
(no subject)
Date: 2012-09-09 03:02 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2012-09-09 03:26 pm (UTC)Then things like trans actors/parts gets more complicated, since there AREN'T many parts written that aren't fetishised, like you said--and then again you get to 'person playing a part, so what do they most LOOK like'. And at what level does the acting part kick in? I think Hollywood tends to try to avoid this whole issue, but I seem to recall a different state of affairs in Sweden. But I cannot remember where I read this so cannot be quoted.
It is probably a bad thing I cannot think of any trans or blind actors, though I can think of deaf ones (and Switched at Birth has mostly deaf characters played by deaf actors.)
(no subject)
Date: 2012-09-09 03:44 pm (UTC)I can see the argument with physical characteristics, but the exception that puzzles me is the fact that the major dwarf roles of recent years have gone to non-dwarf actors (e.g. John Rhys-Davies and Ray Winstone), with all the consequent necessity for trick photography, etc. There are certainly dwarf actors, although they usually get parts that objectify and (to some extent) mock their condition: were they not considered? Now, I realize that the dwarves in Middle-earth and the dwarfs in Snow White are separate races of people rather than human beings of restricted height, but even so, it seems odd to me that this was not apparently a telling consideration.
(no subject)
Date: 2012-09-09 10:18 pm (UTC)I remember there being a bit of a protest about the parts in The Hobbit not going to dwarf actors as they have a union (I think started, or at least heavily influenced, by Warwick Davis). The one film I thought of there was Willow and of course it's also quite old--I remember Billy Barty being in a lot of things back in the 80s as well, but it's not really relevant for 2012, is it?
I've always thought this was a reason they should not ever make The Grey King as a film, as finding the right actor for Bran would be basically impossible.
(no subject)
Date: 2012-09-10 05:39 am (UTC)Given the casting practices on The Seeker, I think that would be the least of our worries. Cafall would have been played by a comedy orangutan.
(no subject)
Date: 2012-09-10 05:21 pm (UTC)I think it made some sense for the Narnian dwarfs to be played by Little People and the Middle-earth ones not -- that seemed to be in accordance with the authors' descriptions. The goblins in Harry Potter were also played by actors with dwarfism, as was Professor Flitwick.
(no subject)
Date: 2012-09-09 04:44 pm (UTC)I wish there were more roles where people just happen to be disabled - the best example I know is Marlee Matlin as the pollster in the West Wing.
If people or trans, or gay, or working class - well those are not disabilities so gay people can play straight ones and vice versa. Nothing wrong with Sean Bean playing a transgender role although you'd like to think he did it with sensitivity.
I did laugh at a radio interview the other day where some daft southerner asked the actor from "Good Cop" whether he could manage a convincing Scouse accent for his role as a Liverpool policeman. He replied that as he was born and raised in Warrington, it wasn't too much of a stretch.
(no subject)
Date: 2012-09-10 07:59 am (UTC)Trans people can (I have at an amateur level) play cis parts too, so it's not a matter of desperately needing typecast parts.
(no subject)
Date: 2012-09-11 09:38 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2012-09-12 07:26 am (UTC)What did you think of the film? For a low budget production I thought it knocked posts off Hollywood's offerings, but then I am a trans woman of the straight persuasion and in a long term relationship so I was a bit miffed by those who said it pandered to the binary.
(no subject)
Date: 2012-09-12 04:55 pm (UTC)Binary-pandering in this case strikes me as a case of "no
bookfilm can be everybookfilm" -- ie, in the perfect future where there are tons and tons of trans characters in movies, we'll have some relationships more towards the binary and some more towards gender and role queerness/fluidity. That said, I do think it nods to non-binaryness where the bike is involved, esp that excellent dialogue at the very end.(no subject)
Date: 2012-09-13 02:15 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2012-09-09 06:50 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2012-09-11 08:37 pm (UTC)I don't like your list of categories.
What the hell are "working class people"? Is this an inborn, or acquired trait like being a Down's person, or a Trans person, or a paraplegic? When a non "working class" actor is portraying a "working class person " is it a question of accent or dialect, as might be the case were they playing the role of someone of another nationality, or would the skill be in aping poor table manners, affinity with whippets, questionable personal hygiene?
(no subject)
Date: 2012-09-11 09:08 pm (UTC)Being inborn or acquired isn't a common factor in my list of categories, and in fact I've not asserted any basis of commonality between them, although if I were to do so it would be that these categories of people have tended to be at a systematic disadvantage within Western society (and in most cases, most other societies too).