steepholm: (Default)
[personal profile] steepholm
I'm curious about attitudes to first-cousin marriage.

First, to get the medical side out of the way, I can see good genetic reasons for not marrying one's first cousin, reasons which may indeed be powerful enough to justify measures banning or restricting the practice. I don't feel qualified to judge that, and for the present purpose I'm not interested in it either. It's clearly less than optimal, like having parents over fifty, but whether it's a sufficiently bad idea to pass laws about it I just don't know.

What I'm interested in here is the visceral ickiness some people clearly feel at the idea of first-cousin marriage - the feeling that it breaks some powerful incest taboo, perhaps just a notch down from marrying one's sibling, child or parent.

I wasn't brought up to feel like that at all, and I'm curious as to why not - or, conversely, why other people do. Since these things are cultural, where are the cultural dividing lines, in terms of geography, generation, or belief systems? My impression is that the taboo feeling is stronger in the States, but I also think that in the UK it's stronger with the younger generation than with my own or older. There are also ethnic groups within the UK where first-cousin marriage is common, notably within the Pakistani community where I believe it runs at over 50%, and of course that has meant that the subject has inevitably become embroiled in rows about race, religion, etc. Has that altered the broader terms of the debate?

In short - as I see it, when I was growing up first-cousin marriage was considered unusual but in no way taboo, at least in my little bit of the world. I think it was even seen as romantic. Now, the feeling that it's taboo is much more widespread.

How does this tally with your experience of your own and other people's opinions? Have things changed?

(no subject)

Date: 2012-10-15 03:49 am (UTC)
ext_6322: (Giotto faces)
From: [identity profile] kalypso-v.livejournal.com
My mother and her brother would also have had such double cousins had the two older children not died in the flu epidemic after the First World War, before my mother and brother were born. I believe that under the Orthodox Church rules my grandparents would not have been allowed to marry, on the grounds that they had siblings married to each other. (Doesn't this come up in War and Peace - Nikolai and Maria could not have married had the marriage between Natasha and Andrei gone ahead?) Presumably the argument is that once husband and wife have become one flesh their sibling pools combine as well. But the Orthodox Church does seem more paranoid about the whole kindred and affinity idea, as they appear to ban everything up to second cousins. I think Catholicism allows second cousins, but you need a special dispensation to marry a first cousin. Again, I imagine that's down to dynastic politics.

(no subject)

Date: 2012-10-15 07:27 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] steepholm.livejournal.com
That's very interesting about the Orthodox Church - an institution of which I'm horribly ignorant. In fact, tell it not in Gath, I've not read War and Peace either. Now I have a reason to put that right!

(no subject)

Date: 2012-10-15 12:40 pm (UTC)
ext_6322: (Book)
From: [identity profile] kalypso-v.livejournal.com
Oh dear, I've given away the ending!

(no subject)

Date: 2012-10-15 08:59 am (UTC)
sheenaghpugh: (Posterity)
From: [personal profile] sheenaghpugh
Other literary examples: in Silas Marner, Nancy refuses her cousin Gilbert Osgood "on the ground solely that he was her cousin", though she might just be being kind; she loves Godfrey. In the Forsyte novels, cousins Val and Holly marry but decide to remain childless.

Re catholicism, I don't think my in-laws, who were Catholic, needed a dispensation, but I could be wrong.

(no subject)

Date: 2012-10-15 12:52 pm (UTC)
ext_6322: (Book)
From: [identity profile] kalypso-v.livejournal.com
Whereas I seem to remember Hugh Walpole puts at least one first-cousin marriage (with child) into his Herries Chronicles, and to the best of my recollection (I'm away from home so can't check the text or the useful family tree) I think all the objections relate to the family feud rather than the degree of kinship. Oh, and isn't Lady Catherine in Pride and Prejudice trying to marry her daughter to first-cousin Darcy? Not that Austen presents this as a Good Idea, but Lady Catherine appears to regard it as right and proper.

The more I think about it, the more it seems to me that I grew up in a culture that doesn't see anything odd about first cousin relationships. I remember when I was a child expressing the idea that I might marry one of mine, and my mother's response was that she thought he'd once said that too, leaving me with the idea that it was normal, rather than "don't be silly". (Neither of us showed any interest in the idea once we grew up!)

(no subject)

Date: 2012-10-15 01:02 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] steepholm.livejournal.com
There's also the Austen example of Mansfield Park, which I alluded to in the post title, where the hero and heroine are first cousins.

(no subject)

Date: 2012-10-16 04:16 am (UTC)
ext_6322: (Book)
From: [identity profile] kalypso-v.livejournal.com
Yes, I remembered that was your starting point after I'd logged out, but have only just got back to admit it!

(no subject)

Date: 2012-10-16 06:39 am (UTC)

Profile

steepholm: (Default)
steepholm

April 2025

S M T W T F S
  12 3 45
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags