With Flunkeys Like These...
Oct. 17th, 2012 08:56 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Next time Brutus is looking for someone to help out with a funeral oration, perhaps he should consider calling Mr Grieve (who deserves the gig on the strength of his name alone):
"Prince Charles's letters are so partisan, reactionary and frankly nutty that if you saw them you would probably consider him unfit to be king. So I'm stopping their publication, and that way you will never know just what an interfering, unconstitutional, right wing bigot he is."
Job done, Mr Attorney General. My mind's entirely at rest.
"Prince Charles's letters are so partisan, reactionary and frankly nutty that if you saw them you would probably consider him unfit to be king. So I'm stopping their publication, and that way you will never know just what an interfering, unconstitutional, right wing bigot he is."
Job done, Mr Attorney General. My mind's entirely at rest.
(no subject)
Date: 2012-10-17 08:37 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2012-10-17 08:59 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2012-10-17 08:49 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2012-10-17 09:00 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2012-10-17 02:11 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2012-10-17 02:26 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2012-10-17 08:49 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2012-10-17 08:57 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2012-10-17 12:34 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2012-10-17 01:43 pm (UTC)I'm a lot less worried about Charles. He can have all the opinions he wants, but he would have no more opportunity to impose them as king than he does now. Surely the present Queen has many opinions, which she expresses in private meetings, but who knows what they are?
(no subject)
Date: 2012-10-17 02:01 pm (UTC)Indeed - unless someone happens to give them away.
I tend to agree about Charles. That a man who employs a servant to put toothpaste on his toothbrush should hold bizarre opinions is no great surprise. Rather, it seems to me that the manner in which Grieve "protected" him (the complaint being levelled by some) was calculated to undermine him. If he really was trying to deflect constitutional worries, he did it in a singularly inept way. I see this as a shot across Charles's bows, against the time when he does become king.
(no subject)
Date: 2012-10-17 05:51 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2012-10-17 09:11 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2012-10-18 09:26 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2012-10-18 09:32 pm (UTC)