steepholm: (Default)
[personal profile] steepholm
How long ago does a crime need to have taken place in order to be described as "historic"? When the BBC mention cases of "historic child abuse" I think of chimney sweeps and the princes in the tower: then it turns out that the abusers and their victims are still around.

(no subject)

Date: 2013-05-01 07:24 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] vschanoes.livejournal.com
Perhaps this is about the difference between "historic" and "historical"? The first would suggest to me that the cases are culturally significant for some reason, while the second would suggest to me that it took place a reasonably long time ago? Or perhaps I'm reversing the connotations...

(no subject)

Date: 2013-05-01 07:37 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] steepholm.livejournal.com
In context - a report on the news today, and other similar reports in recent months - it tends to be used of cases that happened a while ago, rather than those that are somehow especially significant (record-breaking? innovative? the cause of the fall of a government? it's hard to come up with measures for significance in this context that aren't at least a bit queasy-making in themselves, since they imply other cases and victims of abuse to be relatively "insignificant"). But I take your point about historic/historical: that ambiguity was one part of what threw me.

(no subject)

Date: 2013-05-01 07:40 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] vschanoes.livejournal.com
Yeah, I agree re "significant." I was thinking about maybe cases that marked a cultural shift in awareness, or a legal shift in what was considered acceptable. I would never want to imply that child abuse itself could be insignificant.

(no subject)

Date: 2013-05-02 07:09 am (UTC)
sheenaghpugh: (Brain)
From: [personal profile] sheenaghpugh
I don't know if there's a specified time after which crime becomes historic, but will ask on FB and hope my Tame Policeman responds....

(no subject)

Date: 2013-05-02 07:16 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] steepholm.livejournal.com
Thank you!

(no subject)

Date: 2013-05-02 07:29 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cmcmck.livejournal.com
Yeah, I'm still about f'rinstance, although my abuser isn't.

Historical is a much misused term (okay, I know there's just the weeniest chance I might be biased on that one!)
Edited Date: 2013-05-02 11:27 am (UTC)

(no subject)

Date: 2013-05-02 11:29 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] steepholm.livejournal.com
I do worry a bit that the term historic/historical (I've heard both today) has the effect of subliminally communicating the message: "It was all a long time ago, let it go..."

Profile

steepholm: (Default)
steepholm

April 2025

S M T W T F S
  12 3 45
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags