They don't want to go to Chelsea
Sep. 2nd, 2013 12:41 pmUnlike some academics, I've always had a lot of time for Wikipedia. It can be a great place to begin research, I tell my students, though it's a bad place to finish. I've chipped in a few pounds whenever Jimmy Wales's face has appeared at the top of a page asking me for cash.
It's disappointing, then, to find that, having been one of the first organizations to respect Chelsea Manning's statement regarding her gender and name - a move that has since been followed, with varying degrees of completeness and good grace, by much of the world's media - Wiki has now reverted to calling her "Bradley", at least for the next 30 days.
Behind this reversion lies an intense and sometimes acrimonious debate amongst Wikipedia editors and admins. I don't pretend to understand the rather Byzantine process by which disputes are resolved within Wiki, but the conversation is an object lesson in how cissexism works today, amongst people who no doubt think of themselves as tolerant and open minded. The dismissal of the well-documented evidence of the harm done to trans people, both psychological and in terms of physical threat, by misgendering, as well as the underlying assumptions that for trans people (as opposed to, say, Lady Gaga, John Wayne and the Duchess of Cambridge) self-determination is in the gift of the cis majority, here wearing the baggy cloak called "consensus", and that Wiki editors with no experience in the subject are better placed to pronounce on trans issues than trans people - well, it's all rather depressing. Next time sunny Jim comes calling, my donation will be going elsewhere - probably to Trans Media Watch.
It's disappointing, then, to find that, having been one of the first organizations to respect Chelsea Manning's statement regarding her gender and name - a move that has since been followed, with varying degrees of completeness and good grace, by much of the world's media - Wiki has now reverted to calling her "Bradley", at least for the next 30 days.
Behind this reversion lies an intense and sometimes acrimonious debate amongst Wikipedia editors and admins. I don't pretend to understand the rather Byzantine process by which disputes are resolved within Wiki, but the conversation is an object lesson in how cissexism works today, amongst people who no doubt think of themselves as tolerant and open minded. The dismissal of the well-documented evidence of the harm done to trans people, both psychological and in terms of physical threat, by misgendering, as well as the underlying assumptions that for trans people (as opposed to, say, Lady Gaga, John Wayne and the Duchess of Cambridge) self-determination is in the gift of the cis majority, here wearing the baggy cloak called "consensus", and that Wiki editors with no experience in the subject are better placed to pronounce on trans issues than trans people - well, it's all rather depressing. Next time sunny Jim comes calling, my donation will be going elsewhere - probably to Trans Media Watch.
(no subject)
Date: 2013-09-02 01:21 pm (UTC)*Current preferred pronoun; at the time, he identified as outside the gender binary, and I don't recall what pronouns he used then
(no subject)
Date: 2013-09-02 01:55 pm (UTC)Being written out of existence online? Well, there's a novelty! :oS
(no subject)
Date: 2013-09-02 03:13 pm (UTC)This, in spades. Wiki is too random to be considered reliable.
(no subject)
Date: 2013-09-02 04:43 pm (UTC)You're right: it's mentioned in an adjunct article, but nowhere in the article actually about Carter. Whose songs I love. Aaaargh.
(no subject)
Date: 2013-09-02 05:06 pm (UTC)I'm going to continue to engage with the project, to try and get it fixed. I wish I could say I was optimistic about that.
(no subject)
Date: 2013-09-02 05:25 pm (UTC)Having been campaigning on this issue for the better part of forty years I find it gets more, not less depressing as the years go by!
(no subject)
Date: 2013-09-02 06:02 pm (UTC)And, by the way, since the pro-change writer cited the Duchess of Cambridge as someone whose choice of changed name was accepted without a demur, I note that media writers are constantly still referring to her as Kate Middleton, and this doesn't cast doubt on what her right moniker is.
By the way, have you looked at your Wikipedia entry?
(no subject)
Date: 2013-09-02 06:18 pm (UTC)I try not to think about it! My entry was created by an old friend - who nevertheless cut off contact with me when I transitioned. Later (but before said transition) I edited it to give it neutral pronouns, etc., but some time after that it was the site of a ridiculous edit war between a couple of Wiki people who tried to assess whether I was worthy of inclusion by counting how many libraries held my books, and then decided to move all that data into the entry itself (re-introducing gendered pronouns in the process). It's a total mess, in short. Like my website, it's on the list of "Things I'll deal with when I have the reserves to do so."
(no subject)
Date: 2013-09-02 06:19 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2013-09-02 06:22 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2013-09-02 06:38 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2013-09-02 06:44 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2013-09-02 06:49 pm (UTC). . . I can kind of inundate you with music if you want. I discovered Dave Carter and Tracy Grammer in 2002, right before Carter died; "Tillman Co." came on the radio and my mother said instantly and correctly, "That's someone who's lived in Oklahoma," and next they played "I Go Like the Raven" and Carter talked about the inspiration for the song being a dream of "a Tibetan raven goddess dancing on a mountain of skulls," and I bought Drum Hat Budda as soon as I could find it in a store. A number of their songs have turned out to be important to me over the years.
(no subject)
Date: 2013-09-02 06:50 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2013-09-02 07:39 pm (UTC)Besides, knowing Wikipedia, if you try updating the entry first, some editorial masshole is going to revert it using the website as grounds. (In California, you can change your name without going to court, but only by abandoning all use of your previous name.)
(no subject)
Date: 2013-09-02 09:02 pm (UTC)I don't consider the Wiki page my responsibility, but for what it's worth I publish exclusively under my legal name, which is also the one in my passport and on the Change of Name Deed I registered with a solicitor in 2011, the one I vote with, pay my taxes under, have my house registered in at the Land Registry, and am known as by my employer, friends, family and colleagues, bank, utilities, etc etc ad nauseam. Maybe the existence of my old website means that all this fails to cut the mustard in Sacramento, but I don't feel bound by the strange dictates of a local subdivision of a foreign state!
(no subject)
Date: 2013-09-02 09:13 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2013-09-02 10:11 pm (UTC)The website is your responsibility, the Wikipedia article not. But it's necessary to do the one first.
Of course California has no jurisdiction over you, but others' rules may be useful guidance. A US Supreme Court decision not long ago cited the laws of several foreign countries as a moral compass in an ambiguous situation. Those who objected huffily that those countries' laws had no bearing on US jurisprudence had missed the bloody point.
(no subject)
Date: 2013-09-02 11:09 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2013-09-03 07:23 am (UTC)As far as the website is concerned, though, you have a point. Perhaps I should take it down temporarily. (If I can remember how to do so, mind: it occurs to me now that all the data and programs are on my old computer, now gathering dust in another room.)
(no subject)
Date: 2013-09-03 07:23 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2013-09-03 09:41 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2013-09-03 09:53 am (UTC)(I'm David Gerard, the other Wikipedia admin who moved the article to Chelsea. I am also presently attempting to work within the process to get this fixed. I think I can say it's no secret that a lot of Wikimedia Foundation staff and board members are bloody horrified about this, and do appreciate that it's just as if people had voted 250-200 in favour of endorsing gross racism as policy.)
(no subject)
Date: 2013-09-03 10:27 am (UTC)I see also that the anti-Chelsea side of the Manning argument has brought out comments from the sort of people who claim that biology is entirely binary and she will never be a woman; this shows they are 1) ignorant of biology (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intersex); 2) disturbingly reminiscent in argumentative thrust of the sort of people who used to (and maybe still do) claim that biological sex differentiation proves that women belong barefoot in the kitchen.
(no subject)
Date: 2013-09-03 10:42 am (UTC)The problem is that it is literally true that no-one runs Wikipedia. Jimmy Wales certainly doesn't - his job is to be the Queen of England: figurehead, public relations, smile and wave, and if he does anything, the people who in fact write the whole thing get really upset and frequently reverse it. He has no actual power. The WMF doesn't have content control, per CDA Section 230 immunity for content, so actually has to be really careful what other control it exerts.
TransMediaWatch are highly aware of the case.
This really is an entire cluster of fucks.
(no subject)
Date: 2013-09-03 10:43 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2013-09-03 10:51 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2013-09-03 11:10 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2013-09-03 01:17 pm (UTC)Possibly this cissexism is related to the activities which brought her to public attention, but that doesn't excuse them at all.
It is a prime example of WP/WMF shooting itself in both feet. and arms. and donor's feet. etc.
(no subject)
Date: 2013-09-03 01:24 pm (UTC)Sometimes it is a pity that WP is too big to fork meaningfully.
(no subject)
Date: 2013-09-03 01:45 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2013-09-03 01:46 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2013-09-03 02:25 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2013-09-03 04:22 pm (UTC)I think our friend is correct in her assumption of blatant transphobia.
(no subject)
Date: 2013-09-03 04:31 pm (UTC)Islam's trajectory is very similar - although one might argue that his name change demands to be taken even more seriously, reflecting as it does deep spiritual convictions rather than a convenient orthographic simplification. I can't say for sure that the refusal of WP to list him under the name he's had for 35 years reflects a hostility to Muslims, but it's certainly inconsistent with other decisions, and in a way that opens WP up to that charge.
(no subject)
Date: 2013-09-03 08:44 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2013-09-03 09:10 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2013-09-06 05:29 am (UTC)IOU a lot of Dave Carter and Tracy Grammer! Please find selections below. All biases are my own. Some of these songs I just like, but some are important to me.
From When I Go (1998):
"Kate and the Ghost of Lost Love"
Love is a star that will not shine till the hour of your return
And I count the days in cups of wine and the candles I have burned
"The River, Where She Sleeps"
'Cause the waters run so marvelous and deep
In the river, where she sleeps
"Lancelot"
I ain't no untarnished Galahad
Down from Arcadia like a dream in your head
But gentle lady, lend me the pure heart I never had
And I'll bring you roses and bread
And we'll fashion gold out of lead
With all the illusions we shed
"Little Liza Jane"
Bulldog train! She's my ball and chain
Racing, rocking, tightrope-walking little Liza Jane
"Elvis Presley"
Oh, if you should meet me on the march
From Appomattox all in grey
Won't you take this message to the King for me?
From Tanglewood Tree (2000):
"Happytown (All Right with Me)"
The gods will lounge around until the show is through
If it's all right, it's all right with me
And it's all right with you
"Tanglewood Tree"
I'm walking down a bone-dry river where the cool mirage runs true
I'm banking on the fables of the far, far better things we do
"The Mountain"
Some build temples and some find altars
Some come in tall hats and robes spun fine
Some in rags, some in gemstone halters
Some push the pegs back in line
"Crocodile Man"
Inside the house is the hall of mirrors
Inside the mirror is the temple of sin
Inside the temple is the face of Mama
And Mama she knows just where I been
"Cat-Eye Willie Claims His Lover"
You can cry have mercy and crawl the cane for cover
But you're bound for butcher's bride
The slewfoot devil won't be denied
When Cat-Eye Willie come to claim his lover
From Drum Hat Buddha (2002):
"Ordinary Town"
So sang the sage of sixteen summers in the upstairs choir
So sang the old dog down the street beside his wailing wall
Go home, go home, the mayor cried when Jesus came to City Hall
"Tillman Co."
Maybe old Moses come and turn this current back
Cross me over ever holy and dry
Climb me a crooked oak, scar-face, bible-black
Swing this shovel till it cracks the sky
"Disappearing Man"
In the dark, in the dawn, with your wedding dress in tatters
You reveal the yearning desert in the country of your skin
"236-6132"
If I was afraid to break or bleed
I would find someone much easier to need
"Love, the Magician"
Yeah, he tracked them by the muddy waters and he trailed them by the lonely lake
But he only saw two black otters, swimming over by the farther bank
In memoriam: Tracy Grammer, "The Verdant Mile"
I miss you like I love the sound of blackbirds in the trees
I sit alone and wish that either one of you would visit me
But no matter how much seed I hang, what prayer I call out
I cannot bring that bird in from the field or make an angel come around
I hope this is vaguely representative. Enjoy!
(no subject)
Date: 2013-09-06 07:16 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2015-03-11 04:51 am (UTC)Your friend Phil may have won the edit war. At the very least, someone got the information into the article.
(This bulletin brought to you by learning that "Phantom Doll" was the last song Carter wrote before she died, never having considered it in context of gender dysphoria before; it's heartbreaking from that perspective. Anyway, it made me wonder if Wikipedia had gotten over its transphobic asshattery. A little!)
Date: 2015-03-11 08:59 pm (UTC)But I'm glad the Wikipedia article has been corrected.
Edit: The page history continues to be very interesting. Check out the edit attached to the comment "(this is sensitive material. i am tracy grammer and i am quoted in this article. i have edited the words attributed to me and shaped the story more accurately.)"