steepholm: (Default)
[personal profile] steepholm
what did you do

My father told me once that this poster (or its accompanying slogan) was one of the things - along with a general sense that he was missing out on history - that made him stop being a CO and join the army in 1942. The context for the remark was my rather priggish teenage disapproval of his relenting. "I never expected the criticism to come from that direction," he said, or words that effect.

I've made a slight change to the classic poster, to reflect the increasingly successful strain of mood music being played by the Yes campaign in Scotland. There'll only be one chance to think of your children, to do what's right for Scotland, etc. (The No campaign's rendition of the same tune has been rightly mocked.) In the end, it's much easier to envisage today's children berating their parents in future years for bequeathing them a lifetime of austerity rule from an indifferent city hundreds of miles away than for giving them an independent country which is slightly less prosperous than it might otherwise have been - which appears to be the scariest prospect the No campaign can muster. And you'd have to be a fool to give much credence to the Westminster parties' last-minute floundering to give Scotland "Something (but we don't know what) some time (but we don't know when)". At this rate I half expect David Cameron to announce free neeps for all under-5s.

Ah, if only they'd listened to me in June they wouldn't be in this mess, but I fear that's destined to go down as one of history's great missed opportunities, along with Jim Callaghan's autumn 1978 election, and Byrhtnoth's defence of the causeway at the Battle of Maldon.

(no subject)

Date: 2014-09-08 04:46 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] steepholm.livejournal.com
He quotes a Nobel Prize winning economist who says that currency union is very likely, and I certainly can't compete with that, but looking at what the economist actually means by the phrase, it's clear that he doesn't have in mind something like the Euro, where the participating countries all have a say and share a central bank, but rather something like Panama or Ecuador's adoption of the dollar. I suppose one could say that those countries have a "currency union" with the United States, since they do in fact use the same currency, but I don't think that's the partnership of equals Salmond is trying to convey.

(no subject)

Date: 2014-09-08 05:03 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kalimac.livejournal.com
It isn't, and that's the problem. The economist says "oh, there's all kinds of options," and the three he has in mind seem to be: 1) a genuine currency union; 2) Scotland piggy-backing on the Westminster pouund, as Pnama and Ecuador do with the US dollar; 3) none of the above (an actual separate currency?).

The problem with 1) is that everybody in Westminster says it's out. And I certainly believe that. The headline makes it sound as if the economist thinks they'll come around, but if they insist they won't then I can't be sure that even a Nobel-winning economist is right and they're wrong. (Milton Friedman was a Nobel-winning economist, and quite spectacularly wrong, as we've learned to our cost.)

The problem with 2) is that this gives up all control over monetary policy, and is a solution adopted only by third-world countries desperate to ditch their own rotting currency. Not Scotland's position. And worry about losing control over monetary policy is the main reason the UK didn't join the Euro. And this scenario is not a "currency union" any more than a bicyclist grabbing on to a car's rear bumper is getting a ride in the car.

And, as you note, Salmond is banking on an actual currency union. As the No spokesperson quoted at the end of the article asks, what's his plan B? There's nothing in the article to answer that question, certainly not this one economist's assurance that Westminster will come around, and emphatically not if by that he means item 2) above (which doesn't require Westminster to do anything anyway: the US does nothing about Panama and Ecuador).

I'm still not impressed.

(no subject)

Date: 2014-09-08 06:18 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] steepholm.livejournal.com
Exactly so. If I were Salmond I'd be planning on joining the Euro as soon as may be, but he knows that won't fly at the moment.

(no subject)

Date: 2014-09-08 06:34 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kalimac.livejournal.com
What was the SNP's position when the Euro was being floated, 15-odd years ago? Or did it have one?

(no subject)

Date: 2014-09-08 07:05 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] steepholm.livejournal.com
I don't remember, I'm afraid. It would be interesting to know.

(no subject)

Date: 2014-09-09 06:17 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kalimac.livejournal.com
Here's another Nobel Prize winning economist saying that declaring independence without your own currency is crazy. (http://www.nytimes.com/2014/09/08/opinion/paul-krugman-scots-what-the-heck.html?hp&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&module=c-column-top-span-region&region=c-column-top-span-region&WT.nav=c-column-top-span-region&_r=1) Dueling Nobelists! The only thing we lesser folk can do is get out of the way.

Profile

steepholm: (Default)
steepholm

April 2025

S M T W T F S
  12 3 45
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags