Trident Trusted

[steepholm]

I'm puzzled. There was an interview with John Swinney (SNP) on the Today programme this morning, much of which focused on whether the SNP would "hold the Labour party to ransom" over Trident in the event of its being in some kind of arrangement with a minority Labour government after the election. I gather that several of the papers are also talking in these terms.

Personally I wish Labour would drop Trident, but it seems to me that any future Labour government that wished to keep it could ask for support from the Tory opposition for that purpose, making SNP support on the issue unnecessary. Obviously the Tories could sit on their hands, but even if they abstained that would very likely be enough for Labour to get its bill to renew Trident through. Or would the Tories want to be seen walking through the lobbies to vote against the UK's nuclear deterrent, merely for reasons of party advantage? I don't think that would play very well in any subsequent election.

In other words, I don't see what the fuss is about. Have I missed something?

Comments

[andrewducker]

What I find fascinating is that the Conservatives delayed it in this parliament rather than working with Labour to pass it.

I wonder if actually they want to sound tough, without actually wanting to pass it...

[cmcmck.livejournal.com]

I'd be glad to see it gone, but then, I am a pacifist.

[kalimac.livejournal.com]

I've read a lot of historical accounts of dealing with exactly this question going back to the 1950s. As we say among my people, oy.