The Host with the Most?
Jul. 6th, 2015 01:58 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
A few posts ago I was maundering on about the rain falling on just and unjust alike, and whether that saying would have had the same connotations in the relatively arid climate where it was coined as it now carries in my own soggier corner of the world. I suppose my next question is rather similar, though more doctrinally central: just how common was it to drink wine in first-century Palestine?
Clearly they had several skinfuls at the Cana wedding, and at the Last Supper too, but those were special occasions. Was it an everyday drink for your ordinary Joe? Or a luxury good? It makes a big difference to the significance of the Eucharist. If wine is the drinking equivalent of bread - the most staple of staples - then that gives it one kind of significance. But if it's seen as something special, that gives it another.
Even if wine flowed freely and cheaply in Jesus's particular time and place, that certainly hasn't always been the case in the cultures to which Christianity has been introduced. It must have been another story in beer-drinking countries such as Egypt and Germany, for example. The same goes for England, where wine was seen as a posh drink until very recent times. Telling an Anglo-Saxon peasant to drink wine in memory of Christ must have conveyed a very different message from telling a first-century Roman to do the same.
Christopher Marlowe is said to have joked that the Eucharist "would have bin much better being administred in a Tobacco pipe" - and after all, why not? One for the alternative historians, perhaps.
Clearly they had several skinfuls at the Cana wedding, and at the Last Supper too, but those were special occasions. Was it an everyday drink for your ordinary Joe? Or a luxury good? It makes a big difference to the significance of the Eucharist. If wine is the drinking equivalent of bread - the most staple of staples - then that gives it one kind of significance. But if it's seen as something special, that gives it another.
Even if wine flowed freely and cheaply in Jesus's particular time and place, that certainly hasn't always been the case in the cultures to which Christianity has been introduced. It must have been another story in beer-drinking countries such as Egypt and Germany, for example. The same goes for England, where wine was seen as a posh drink until very recent times. Telling an Anglo-Saxon peasant to drink wine in memory of Christ must have conveyed a very different message from telling a first-century Roman to do the same.
Christopher Marlowe is said to have joked that the Eucharist "would have bin much better being administred in a Tobacco pipe" - and after all, why not? One for the alternative historians, perhaps.
(no subject)
Date: 2015-07-06 02:44 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2015-07-06 03:19 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2015-07-06 03:23 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2015-07-06 01:49 pm (UTC)You forget that Germany is and has been for centuries a major wine producing culture.
Interestingly, the Scottish tradition at the Eucharist is to serve a fortified wine such as port, although I don't know how old the tradition is- Scotland would never have been able to produce wine of its own.
(no subject)
Date: 2015-07-06 01:58 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2015-07-06 07:57 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2015-07-06 08:15 pm (UTC)The 17th century saw climate change and a mini ice age which saw a lot of English production off until the climate change of our own times- my home county of Kent now produces fizz which takes awards away from the Champagne region much to the chagrin of our French neighbours! :o)
(no subject)
Date: 2015-07-06 08:16 pm (UTC)(We lived in Rochester for three years, and certainly enjoyed the local wines then).
(no subject)
Date: 2015-07-06 08:19 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2015-07-06 08:20 pm (UTC)Anti-whine poem to memorize by heart
Date: 2015-07-06 05:06 pm (UTC)Re: Anti-whine poem to memorize by heart
Date: 2015-07-06 06:59 pm (UTC)Re: Anti-whine poem to memorize by heart
Date: 2015-07-06 07:06 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2015-07-06 06:21 pm (UTC)The concept of kosher wine goes back to Biblical times, so my answer would be "very." Plus first-century Judaea is a Roman province and the Romans were serious about their viticulture, so it's not like only the local culture would have been receptive to the significance. I think of it as a drinking staple of most of the ancient world, obviously remembering the existence of beer. There are ancient Egyptian and Near Eastern vineyards, though, and red wine plays an important role in Egyptian ritual life. It's one of the standard provisions for the afterlife. The Phoenicians are incredibly influential in furthering the spread of wine not just as a traded commodity, but as a technology. [edit] tl;dr I think your ordinary Josephus might have considered the really good stuff a luxury good, but in terms of the ability to come home with a couple of asses' worth of plonk, there would have been lots to choose from.
(no subject)
Date: 2015-07-06 06:56 pm (UTC)That sounds unnervingly like today. The remark of the host at Cana suggests there may have been wine snobs back then too: “Everyone serves the good wine first, and when people have drunk freely, then the poor wine. But you have kept the good wine until now.”
(no subject)
Date: 2015-07-06 07:42 pm (UTC)I wonder whether the relative rarity of wine contributed to the pre-Vatican II Roman Catholic tradition that only the priest received the Eucharist in both kinds. However, this has been illegal in the Church of England since the Sacrament Act of 1547, except in cases of grave emergency. (That was a contribution from my husband the church historian.)
My Nonconformist-mixed-with-Anglican background means that I have received the blood of Christ in the form of Communion wine (vile), non-alcoholic Communion wine (worse, and I once had to drink a full chalice of it), grape juice, Ribena (because the Communion steward was embarrassed to buy grape juice - ?), sherry, and Lindisfarne mead.
Here endeth the spill of random chunks of information!
(no subject)
Date: 2015-07-06 07:49 pm (UTC)Perhaps it's as well that Jesus didn't institute the eat-y part of the process in Marmite soldiers. That would have sorted the sheep from the goats!
(no subject)
Date: 2015-07-06 08:31 pm (UTC)I wonder whether it would have been possible for yeast extract to have been invented by the first century?
(no subject)
Date: 2015-07-06 09:59 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2015-07-07 04:08 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2015-07-06 07:55 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2015-07-06 08:02 pm (UTC)Of course, on Lewis they were cannier and combined the two.
(no subject)
Date: 2015-07-06 08:03 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2015-07-06 08:15 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2015-07-06 08:24 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2015-07-07 04:46 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2015-07-06 08:16 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2015-07-06 08:19 pm (UTC)(Later finds at L'Anse aux Meadowes have included butternuts and wood, indicating that the Norse did get as far down as grape-supporting areas; and they could have brought home enough grapes for a pressing; but only once or twice).
(no subject)
Date: 2015-07-06 08:21 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2015-07-07 04:47 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2015-07-07 04:51 pm (UTC)We were lucky to be on the Links this June when they'd literally just uncovered a finely preserved Neolithic well on the beach.
Funnily enough, I posted a few pics of the Ness dig just yesterday!
(no subject)
Date: 2015-07-07 04:48 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2015-07-07 04:51 pm (UTC)I'll add you back as my blog is f-locked but that should let you in!
(no subject)
Date: 2015-07-06 09:44 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2015-07-06 10:01 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2015-07-07 07:10 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2015-07-07 12:08 am (UTC)Nine
(no subject)
Date: 2015-07-07 07:22 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2015-07-07 11:20 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2015-07-07 03:50 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2015-07-07 12:35 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2015-07-07 04:10 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2015-07-07 05:26 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2015-07-08 06:36 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2015-07-07 06:14 pm (UTC)In my day most churches got their wines from ecclesiastical suppliers. It was nasty, sugary stuff; you wouldn't want to drink it socially. I did however have a colleague with a drink problem who used to "cream" small amounts off the top of all the bottles in the hope that nobody would notice.
(no subject)
Date: 2015-07-07 10:59 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2015-07-08 08:04 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2015-07-09 10:46 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2015-07-07 11:06 pm (UTC)Climate and theology, yes! :-) Agreed, an interesting idea. As I have heard, in England in later times, anyway, most people would drink ale, then beer when it became the drink of choice(you had to make ale daily, while beer kept better, according to a history of drinking in England I have read). Wine would indeed have been posh, I imagine.