steepholm: (Default)
[personal profile] steepholm
My obituary of Diana Wynne Jones appeared in today's Independent. The content is pretty much as I wrote it, but the subeditor managed to turn it into a headline about J. K. Rowling, which does not please me.

(no subject)

Date: 2011-03-31 12:12 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gair.livejournal.com
Beautiful, despite the use of arbitrary authority by the sub-editor, who is clearly silly if not a fusspot. Thanks.

(Ha, I was just thinking, I don't have a DWJ icon - but of course I do! Hidden in plain view.)

(no subject)

Date: 2011-03-31 12:14 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cmcmck.livejournal.com
To misquote the bard:

First thing we do, let's hang all the sub-eds.............

(no subject)

Date: 2011-03-31 12:28 pm (UTC)
ext_14294: A redhead an a couple of cats. (Default)
From: [identity profile] ashkitty.livejournal.com
It's as if they (whoever They are in this case, I'm confused) still don't believe that anyone will recognise her name outside of the connection to Rowling--which is clearly not true, and the international outpouring of of sorrow on hearing of her death, before the news outlets even mentioned it, should be evidence enough of that. Beautifully written, anyway.

(no subject)

Date: 2011-03-31 12:38 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] steepholm.livejournal.com
Yes - by their own participles!

(no subject)

Date: 2011-03-31 12:40 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] steepholm.livejournal.com
So you do! :)

I'm glad you liked it.

(no subject)

Date: 2011-03-31 12:47 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] steepholm.livejournal.com
whoever They are in this case, I'm confused

They are a set of demons who like to play wargames with the various worlds, if I remember my Homeward Bounders. Or possibly people who don't know much about fantasy.

Beautifully written, anyway.

Thank you!

(no subject)

Date: 2011-03-31 12:50 pm (UTC)
ext_14294: A redhead an a couple of cats. (Default)
From: [identity profile] ashkitty.livejournal.com
Well yes, that is them; I just wish They were not quite so fantasy-clueless as well! ;)

(no subject)

Date: 2011-03-31 01:14 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cmcmck.livejournal.com
Painful, that! :o)

(no subject)

Date: 2011-03-31 01:34 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] shewhomust.livejournal.com
Yes. Silly subeditors. Fortunately, we all know about their little ways, and are not misled...

(no subject)

Date: 2011-03-31 01:44 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nineweaving.livejournal.com
...a generous, funny, prodigiously-creative woman, sharp of wit and occasionally of tongue, who was constantly inspired by the absurdity and wonder of the world about her.

Beautifully said.

Nine

(no subject)

Date: 2011-03-31 02:18 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sartorias.livejournal.com
That was a lovely piece. (And Rowling in the title will just get people to read it.)

(no subject)

Date: 2011-03-31 02:20 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] calimac.livejournal.com
I am particularly impressed by the diabolical cleverness of turning your reference to Rowling, which points towards DWJ, the other way round, so now DWJ points to Rowling.

Am reminded also of two things: 1) UKL's perplexed reaction on reading that a school for wizards was a new and unprecedented idea; 2) the recent tendency to treat Dunsany as merely a precursor to and influence on Lovecraft.

(no subject)

Date: 2011-03-31 02:21 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] steepholm.livejournal.com
Thank you.

(no subject)

Date: 2011-03-31 02:21 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] veronica-milvus.livejournal.com
You know, I never heard of her before, and I don't know why. I should have been the right age for her books.

(no subject)

Date: 2011-03-31 02:22 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] steepholm.livejournal.com
You're right, of course: a sprat to catch a whale, as they say.

(no subject)

Date: 2011-03-31 02:22 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] steepholm.livejournal.com
The good news is you still are! :)

(no subject)

Date: 2011-03-31 02:25 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] steepholm.livejournal.com
I am particularly impressed by the diabolical cleverness of turning your reference to Rowling, which points towards DWJ, the other way round, so now DWJ points to Rowling.

Indeed. I also admire the subliminal reference to John the Baptist in that phrase about "paving the way." At least DWJ managed to avoid having her head cut off.

(no subject)

Date: 2011-03-31 02:27 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] steepholm.livejournal.com
That's good to know - and, as [livejournal.com profile] sartorias notes downthread, it will draw some Potterheads to read it who might not otherwise.

(no subject)

Date: 2011-03-31 02:46 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fjm.livejournal.com
It was lovely.

(no subject)

Date: 2011-03-31 03:03 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] steepholm.livejournal.com
So glad you liked it.

(no subject)

Date: 2011-03-31 03:15 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] intertext.livejournal.com
That was lovely, Charlie.

I like how so many of the tributes are subtly pointing out how much DWJ had done _before_ JKR, especially when "they" (and "she") always claimed such originality! And the silly title doesn't detract from how seriously great DWJ was.

(no subject)

Date: 2011-03-31 03:23 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] steepholm.livejournal.com
And the silly title doesn't detract from how seriously great DWJ was.

This is very true - and thank you.

(no subject)

Date: 2011-03-31 04:04 pm (UTC)
sheenaghpugh: (Brain)
From: [personal profile] sheenaghpugh
That's infuriating. It's very reminiscent of a recent headline in the US - "Franzen beaten to major book award". Not "Jennifer Egan wins major book award". It's as if journos have only heard of a few writers and feel obliged to frame everything in terms of them, in case we share this ignorance.

(no subject)

Date: 2011-03-31 04:17 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] steepholm.livejournal.com
I'd not heard the Franzen story. That really is annoying, especially when you look at it within the larger context of Franzenfreude (an unhappy neologism, but there you go).

(no subject)

Date: 2011-03-31 05:37 pm (UTC)
sovay: (Default)
From: [personal profile] sovay
It's still a lovely remembrance. Thank you for it.

(no subject)

Date: 2011-03-31 06:09 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] steepholm.livejournal.com
I only wish I'd been able to put more personal memories into it, but alas I was constrained by the form.

(no subject)

Date: 2011-04-01 02:48 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] aryky.livejournal.com
Thank you for this.

(no subject)

Date: 2011-04-01 07:31 am (UTC)
ewein2412: (Default)
From: [personal profile] ewein2412
The Guardian obit quotes DWJ as "generously" commenting that Rowling may have read her books and been influenced by them. A lovely gentle dig.

I have sent off a brief chiding note to the obituaries ed. at the Independent (which I probably would have done anyway, because the headline makes my blood boil); to wit, "An obituary celebrates a person's lifetime achievement. Ms. Jones's lifetime achievement was in her excellent and original novels, not in her serving as a herald for a more celebrated writer." Peasants.

(no subject)

Date: 2011-04-01 07:32 am (UTC)
ewein2412: (Default)
From: [personal profile] ewein2412
I like the measured tone. It feels personal without being heartwrenching.

(no subject)

Date: 2011-04-01 08:12 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] steepholm.livejournal.com
I hope they print it - or at least that it hits home.

Profile

steepholm: (Default)
steepholm

February 2026

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags