"Red Indians" in play
Sep. 15th, 2009 12:46 pmThe earliest account I've found is from Kenneth Grahame's The Golden Age (1895), where he's describing the games of his own childhood (Grahame was born in 1859):
They [i.e. the adults, aka 'Olympians'] were unaware of Indians,
nor recked they anything of bisons or of pirates (with pistols!),
though the whole place swarmed with such portents. They cared
not about exploring for robbers' caves, nor digging for hidden
treasure. Perhaps, indeed, it was one of their best qualities
that they spent the greater part of their time stuffily indoors.
To be sure, there was an exception in the curate, who would
receive unblenching the information that the meadow beyond the
orchard was a prairie studded with herds of buffalo, which it was
our delight, moccasined and tomahawked, to ride down with those
whoops that announce the scenting of blood. He neither laughed
nor sneered, as the Olympians would have done; but possessed of a
serious idiosyncrasy, he would contribute such lots of
valuable suggestion as to the pursuit of this particular sort of
big game that, as it seemed to us, his mature age and eminent
position could scarce have been attained without a practical
knowledge of the creature in its native lair. Then, too, he was
always ready to constitute himself a hostile army or a band of
marauding Indians on the shortest possible notice: in brief, a
distinctly able man, with talents, so far as we could judge,
immensely above the majority. I trust he is a bishop by this
time,--he had all the necessary qualifications, as we knew.
The combination of Indians and Pirates (or at least robbers) is particularly striking for Peter Pan watchers. But clearly by this time (the late 1860s?) most of the conventions of the game are well established. Are there any earlier instances of British children playing this game, in fact or fiction?
(no subject)
Date: 2009-09-15 12:02 pm (UTC)However, I do know that George Catlin the painter came over to the UK in the early 1840s, with displays of paintings and artefacts, and then brought over Native Americans to wear the costumes, use the artefacts, etc. in 1844. These were Ojibway, apparently. I'm not entirely sure what they did in terms of performance, though I ordered a book earlier this morning which may provide some clues. However, I have found references which suggest that Catlin toured extensively in the UK during this period.
Also, I have come across tantalisingly brief references to Native Americans participating/being displayed at the Great Exhibition, but with no indication of what they did.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-09-15 12:57 pm (UTC)Plus, the English would have had brought back stories after the Seven Years' War, I imagine. Plus, as you say, Cooper.
But my guess (entirely supposition, but in the way of "maybe you can look here") is that the Englishmen who went over for the Land Rush and Gold Rush brought back stories about native peoples that added to an already existing narrative (marauding Indians, and English colonists murdered on their farms should have already been in the consciousness well before cowboys appear), and the narrative shifted to the more recent one of Cowboys and Indians, which was reinforced by travelling shows and dime novels.
One of the things that makes me think this is that Graham's description, and even Barrie's Indians, aren't part of the C/I game -- it's just Indians, and Indians with tomahawks and other accoutrements of the Native Americans of the Eastern part of North America. If you look at the narrative in places like Germany, for example (and the C/I thing is extremely popular there: there were still parks dedicated to it and the books of Karl May were very popular well into the 90s, and maybe still now), it's all much later, and the natives represented are the Plains peoples like the Apache, Sioux, and Comanche.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-09-15 12:59 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-09-15 01:16 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-09-15 01:16 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-09-15 01:17 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-09-15 04:52 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-09-15 04:58 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-09-17 11:32 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-09-17 09:54 pm (UTC)