(no subject)

Date: 2016-03-12 03:26 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ron-broxted.livejournal.com
So far as social meejah I can't abide Rowling. She wrote a very lucrative series of kids books. Why the hell she feels qualified to pontificate (like some mad old lady with a cat) on Scots independence, or anything outside Potter is stupefying.

(no subject)

Date: 2016-03-12 05:02 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] steepholm.livejournal.com
She's not the only person on Twitter who feels entitled to pontificate, from what I hear! I don't blame her for that, so much as other people for treating her as an expert - if indeed they do.

(no subject)

Date: 2016-03-12 06:39 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kalimac.livejournal.com
That's another fine line - between a celebrity who thinks their fame makes them into an expert on every subject and one who decides that if they're going to have all this influence, they might as well use it to promote what they consider good causes.

Example of case 1, the genuine expert on his own subject who's turned into an ignorant blowhard on topics he knows nothing about: Richard Dawkins. Example of case 2, the celebrity who uses his fame to promote good causes: Sean Penn.

I haven't been following Rowling in detail, but I think she falls into case 2. Even if you disagree with her on Scottish independence.

(no subject)

Date: 2016-03-12 07:24 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ron-broxted.livejournal.com
There is the Pontiff of course. Quite a few gasp in awe at her utterances, which reminds me, I must away and bomb TERFs.

Profile

steepholm: (Default)
steepholm

April 2025

S M T W T F S
  12 3 45
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags