steepholm: (madness lies)
[personal profile] steepholm
These futuristic visions of the year 2000 from around 1900 are almost too deliciously steampunk to be true, but apparently they are the genuine article:

Memories of the year 2000


For the rest, see here.

(no subject)

Date: 2011-09-19 10:13 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nineweaving.livejournal.com
How endearingly silly!

I've always loved George Du Maurier's Telephonoscope (1879).

Nine

(no subject)

Date: 2011-09-20 09:31 am (UTC)
ext_12726: (autumn fern)
From: [identity profile] heleninwales.livejournal.com
Oh, that's brilliant! So prescient and also so very wrong with regards to the clothes. :)

(no subject)

Date: 2011-09-20 07:18 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cmcmck.livejournal.com
Isn't it odd, though, how it never occurs to people that clothing also changes over historical time? :o)

(no subject)

Date: 2011-09-20 07:45 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] steepholm.livejournal.com
Yes, especially when you compare this (and the Du Maurier mentioned by [livejournal.com profile] nineweaving) to visions of the future from the 1960s, when innovations in clothing seemed to be quite a focus.

(no subject)

Date: 2011-09-20 09:53 am (UTC)
ext_6322: (Tyce)
From: [identity profile] kalypso-v.livejournal.com
But when you watch science fiction, you can always date it by the clothes - even though they think they're being terribly futuristic, with hindsight they're absolutely of their own time.

(no subject)

Date: 2011-09-20 11:20 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] steepholm.livejournal.com
Very true. These people don't even seem to be trying, though.

Profile

steepholm: (Default)
steepholm

January 2026

S M T W T F S
    12 3
4567 8910
11 121314151617
1819 2021222324
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags