Olympics? Where's they to, my luvver?
Apr. 29th, 2012 10:11 amDozens of Bristol billboards have suddenly sprouted advertisements paid for by the Mayor of London, Transport for London, and the Olympic Committee, informing us that "Certain roads will be affected during the games".
Well, I'd guessed that, but since London is over 100 miles away and no events are being held in Bristol, does it really require an expensive advertising campaign to tell us? (Actually, that's not quite true: the Olympic torch will be snaking its way through the city at some point, but I doubt that's going to cause more disruption than, say, the annual Bristol half-marathon, the St Pauls Carnival, or the occasional protest march, all of which take place quite happily without the need for all the city's hoardings to be booked up.) Now we know where the money went...
Anyway, I was wondering just how far afield the London Olympic street closure posters had reached. Any advance on 100 miles?
sheenaghpugh, are you awash with them in Shetland?
Meanwhile, I am meant to be voting soon in a referendum on whether Bristol should follow London's lead in having an elected mayor. So far, I have received no literature or canvas visits from either side, although the local paper is certainly cheerleading for the change. A couple of weeks ago it ran a lengthy piece by Michael Heseltine, urging Bristolians to seize this historic opportunity for a place at the high table of British politics, not to get left behind by the tide of history, to prove itself worth of its glorious heritage, to grab this special offer while it was still in the shops, etc. I am guessing that the same article appeared in other local papers too, with the word 'Bristol' changed for 'Sunderland', etc., because there wasn't a word in it that related to the city specifically.
As readers of this blog will know (c.f. all the reasons why it was imperative we join the Euro lest we get left behind by the tide of history, etc.) I react badly to high-pressure sales tactics, and Heseltine's piece has almost convinced me to vote No. But I'd still be interested in any actual arguments on either side, since I've heard none yet.
I also wonder, only somewhat tangentially: how many directly-elected mayors around the world are women, and is it a significantly higher or lower proportion than mayors elected by councillors (like the female mayor Bristol has now, for example)?
Well, I'd guessed that, but since London is over 100 miles away and no events are being held in Bristol, does it really require an expensive advertising campaign to tell us? (Actually, that's not quite true: the Olympic torch will be snaking its way through the city at some point, but I doubt that's going to cause more disruption than, say, the annual Bristol half-marathon, the St Pauls Carnival, or the occasional protest march, all of which take place quite happily without the need for all the city's hoardings to be booked up.) Now we know where the money went...
Anyway, I was wondering just how far afield the London Olympic street closure posters had reached. Any advance on 100 miles?
Meanwhile, I am meant to be voting soon in a referendum on whether Bristol should follow London's lead in having an elected mayor. So far, I have received no literature or canvas visits from either side, although the local paper is certainly cheerleading for the change. A couple of weeks ago it ran a lengthy piece by Michael Heseltine, urging Bristolians to seize this historic opportunity for a place at the high table of British politics, not to get left behind by the tide of history, to prove itself worth of its glorious heritage, to grab this special offer while it was still in the shops, etc. I am guessing that the same article appeared in other local papers too, with the word 'Bristol' changed for 'Sunderland', etc., because there wasn't a word in it that related to the city specifically.
As readers of this blog will know (c.f. all the reasons why it was imperative we join the Euro lest we get left behind by the tide of history, etc.) I react badly to high-pressure sales tactics, and Heseltine's piece has almost convinced me to vote No. But I'd still be interested in any actual arguments on either side, since I've heard none yet.
I also wonder, only somewhat tangentially: how many directly-elected mayors around the world are women, and is it a significantly higher or lower proportion than mayors elected by councillors (like the female mayor Bristol has now, for example)?
(no subject)
Date: 2012-04-29 12:14 pm (UTC)Every instinct I have is against the idea of elected mayors, and has been since the idea was floated in Manchester in the 1990s. One thing that struck me as sinister then was that there didn't seem to be any way of getting rid of them between elections; if I wanted to get rid of my council leader, I have a rough idea of how I'd go about it (though you may reasonably point out that I have an advantage over the average voter as I'm a member of the same party). Even with a a prime minister there's a mechanism for turning them out. But the councillors can't vote out the mayor however bad they turn out to be.
Essentially, though, I see it as part of the drift (what do I mean "drift", it's a headlong dive) towards the politics of personality cult, where party leaders' wives get more attention than their colleagues, and to hell with the policies. London's now gripped in a ridiculous Ken and Boris pantomime which Boris looks likely to win because a lot of people have decided he's slightly less objectionable as an individual. But I just don't understand this idea that a single person is more effective than a consensus. It keeps reminding me of that passage in Pratchett:
"Royalty was like dandelions. No matter how many heads you chopped off, the roots were still there underground, waiting to spring up again.
It seemed to be a chronic disease. It was as if even the most intelligent person had this little blank spot in their heads where someone had written: 'Kings. What a good idea.' Whoever had created humanity had left in a major design flaw. It was its tendency to bend at the knees."
This mayoral craze is the same thing.
(no subject)
Date: 2012-04-29 12:22 pm (UTC)I love the quotation from Pratchett, though it's sad that it's true.
(no subject)
Date: 2012-04-29 04:23 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2012-04-29 04:31 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2012-04-29 10:03 am (UTC)We're also getting mighty fed up with Johnson interfering in local politics!
'Lympix? Wossat then?
(no subject)
Date: 2012-04-29 10:27 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2012-04-29 12:27 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2012-04-29 10:19 am (UTC)And we don't have any signs about Olympic road disruption, despite being only 50 miles from London.
When I was commuting regularly from Cambridge to Cardiff, the Work In the City, Live in Bristol brigade were a weekly known pain -- hogging space on trains and the roads and generally adopting all the usual Rich and Important entitlement behaviours. Like Northants, parts of Bristol and its hinterland seem in their heads to be London, really. And they're the category that will be benefiting from all the corporate hospitality tickets for the Olympics (and expecting to drive door to door without interference). I would think they're the root of the road signage.
(no subject)
Date: 2012-04-29 10:25 am (UTC)You may well be right about the Bristol-London commuters - although in that case they have chosen their hoarding sites badly by putting them in this part of town...
(no subject)
Date: 2012-04-29 10:43 am (UTC)I come from Coventry. My uncle (Bill Sheridan) was its Lord Mayor for a term in the 70s.
(no subject)
Date: 2012-04-29 10:34 am (UTC)I don't know anything about them, but Siobhan Benita is running for Mayor of London as an Independent and Jenny Jones is running for the Greens.
(no subject)
Date: 2012-04-29 11:56 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2012-04-29 01:19 pm (UTC)Regarding road closures, being in the Snowdonia National Park, we have no billboards and hence no Olympic poster, but we do have the Olympic torch passing through our tiny town, so there may be some sort of notice in due course. Though as you say, it won't be any more disruptive than things like the Cader Race or the other events that occasionally take over the town square.
(no subject)
Date: 2012-04-29 10:42 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2012-04-29 11:47 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2012-04-29 10:45 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2012-04-29 11:43 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2012-04-29 11:14 am (UTC)Item 2: My municipality, which is a chunk of suburbia with over 100,000 people, recently had a referendum on directly electing our mayor. The argument in favor was that it would put our city in the big leagues, as we say in the US (and give the mayor a doubled, 4-year term so there would be less distracting turnover). However, nobody demonstrated that it would improve the actual functioning of city government, rather the opposite, and the referendum failed.
(no subject)
Date: 2012-04-29 11:51 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2012-04-29 11:44 am (UTC)And, since I'm in the ACT and we don't have local government, we have a line of women the whole way up, for the first time in our history. Katy Gallagher is Chief Minister, Julia Gillard as Pime Minister, Quentin Bryce as Governor-General and, of course, the Queen.
(no subject)
Date: 2012-04-29 11:55 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2012-04-29 12:53 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2012-04-29 01:28 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2012-04-29 06:31 pm (UTC)http://www.cawp.rutgers.edu/fast_facts/levels_of_office/documents/elective.pdf
(no subject)
Date: 2012-04-29 06:50 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2012-04-30 12:23 am (UTC)