steepholm: (Default)
[personal profile] steepholm
Bugger - it's as I feared, and Bristol has voted for a directly elected Mayor, on a turnout of 24% (in one polling station, as low as 6%). The figures were 53.35% to 46.7% - a difference of 5,100 votes.

So far, we have no idea what powers the Mayor might be given, nor how he (or just possibly she) might be got rid of, nor much else. That's all to be decided later, apparently! But whatever the dispensation, it's now been pre-approved by the electors of Bristol - or rather, by just under 13% of them, which was enough.

So far, only Bristol has voted in favour. I'm not sure whether it was also uncoincidentally the only city where a referendum was being held but not council elections, but I wouldn't be terribly surprised.

(no subject)

Date: 2012-05-04 03:18 pm (UTC)
kalypso: (Vote)
From: [personal profile] kalypso
It seems likely that it's no coincidence - if they had no other reason to turn out, I'd expect people wanting to change something to feel a stronger motivation than those wanting no change. Also people voting in a council election might be slightly more confident in the existing council system.

(no subject)

Date: 2012-05-04 03:20 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ron-broxted.livejournal.com
Another (useless) layer of bureaucrats? 6%? Jeez I heard lowest in UK was 20%. Dude...Dude....!

(no subject)

Date: 2012-05-04 04:49 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] steepholm.livejournal.com
6% in Cabot ward, according the article I linked.

(no subject)

Date: 2012-05-04 04:12 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] http://users.livejournal.com/la_marquise_de_/
That is indeed a pain. Sorry to hear it.

Profile

steepholm: (Default)
steepholm

February 2026

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags