steepholm: (Default)
[personal profile] steepholm
This is the second time in a couple of weeks that I've seen E. Nesbit referred to as "E. E. Nesbit" (the first was in the Tom Shippey article I mentioned a few days ago). Where did the extra "E." come from? I'm no Nesbit expert, but as far as I'm aware she never published under that name, any more than Rosemary Sutcliff published as Rosemary Sutcliffe, despite popular belief to the contrary.

I suspect that in Nesbit's case, it's that we aren't used to writers having one rather than two initials: C. S. Lewis, J. K. Rowling, J. B. Priestley, E. F. Benson, H. G. Wells, etc: the pattern is two (or occasionally more, as with Tolkien), and Nesbit's missed beat makes us want to throw in another as a makeweight. The exception seems to be where the initial acknowledges an unfavoured first name, but only as the herald of the main forename, as in F. Scott Fitzgerald, but that's quite another kettle of rhythmic fish.

(no subject)

Date: 2012-09-05 02:18 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cmcmck.livejournal.com
Having recently reviewed a book for the SCJ on the London press during the thirty Years' War by a Jane E E Boyes.....

I stick to my given name and my maiden name for those purposes- the latter because it makes citation less complicated for those doing it.

(no subject)

Date: 2012-09-05 03:32 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] joxn.livejournal.com
Also A. A. Milne. But I bet it comes from E. E. Cummings.
Edited Date: 2012-09-05 03:32 pm (UTC)

(no subject)

Date: 2012-09-05 03:50 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] steepholm.livejournal.com
That's possible, although they're unlikely writers to be confused in almost any other way.

(no subject)

Date: 2012-09-05 03:51 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] joxn.livejournal.com
Sure, but it's not semantic confusion, it's confusion at a much shallower, even phonotactic level.

(no subject)

Date: 2012-09-05 07:23 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] drasecretcampus.livejournal.com
e. e. nesbit.

and what i want to know is so how do you like
your blueeyed boy
mr Psammead?

(no subject)

Date: 2012-09-06 03:27 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ethelmay.livejournal.com
Hah! You've fallen into the same trap as Kipling did. The Psammead is nowhere referred to as male. When E. Nesbit said Five Children and It, she meant It.

(no subject)

Date: 2012-09-06 03:29 am (UTC)

(no subject)

Date: 2012-09-05 04:41 pm (UTC)
ext_6322: (Book)
From: [identity profile] kalypso-v.livejournal.com
Perhaps at some level they remember she's an Edith, but know she used initials so are trying to fill in that second syllable somehow?

(no subject)

Date: 2012-09-05 09:52 pm (UTC)
gillo: (Magdalen reading)
From: [personal profile] gillo
As long as they don't think she's Enid.

;-)

(no subject)

Date: 2012-09-05 06:16 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] calimac.livejournal.com
As far as I know, Nesbit didn't even have a middle name. There are occasional other writers who used a single initial in their byline, like A. Merritt. I hadn't seen this error before, and I advocate stomping it out now, with a hob-nailed boot.

(no subject)

Date: 2012-09-05 07:24 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] drasecretcampus.livejournal.com
I keep thinking of her as an Enid. I also seem to be stumbling across her, and not just because of Ms Wilson. Must read the horror collection.

(no subject)

Date: 2012-09-06 06:20 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] communicator.livejournal.com
When I was a child I thought she was EE Nesbit. I mean for over a decade at least. That's because I had only heard her name, said by my mum. For some reason it does sound like 'Ee-ee' when you put that initial stress on it.

Profile

steepholm: (Default)
steepholm

January 2026

S M T W T F S
    12 3
4567 8910
11 121314151617
1819 2021222324
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags