steepholm: (Default)
[personal profile] steepholm
Wayne LaPierre's statement on behalf of the NRA has drawn a lot of comment, but I've gained exclusive access to a revealing passage that was dropped from the final version due to lack of space:

It’s been pointed out that most deaths by firearms are not the result of random strangers killing in public spaces. More commonly the killer is a husband, wife or partner, and the home is the scene of the crime. Well, I want you to know that the NRA is listening. We hear you. Naturally, we recommend that under most circumstances people who are married keep a gun on them at all times when in their own homes. The trouble comes when couples get intimate. That’s when they tend to forget about the possibility of being murdered by their loved one. What do couples do before they leap into the sack? They get naked. In other words, they disarm.

That’s the real outrage. All over this country, millions of couples are having unprotected sex, without so much as a derringer velcroed to the bedpost, and the result is thousands of tragic deaths each year. We in the NRA are not prepared to stand by and let this happen. I pledge today that we will fund a program of volunteers, ready to provide security whenever and wherever American citizens are making sweet, sweet love. With just one call to a toll-free number you can be making whoopee sure in the knowledge that an NRA marksman is stationed just across the street, his rifle sights trained on your writhing bodies, ready pull the trigger at the first sign of funny business. We see this as our neighborly duty.

We trust this will give you the peace of mind you seek, and the confidence to get on with that most precious of God-given tasks – the creation of innocent little children.

(no subject)

Date: 2012-12-22 11:34 am (UTC)
jadelennox: Peace: Shalom / Salaam (politics: peace)
From: [personal profile] jadelennox
Is it true that UK coverage of the speech had to clarify it was not a spoof?

(no subject)

Date: 2012-12-22 12:44 pm (UTC)
kalypso: (Bang)
From: [personal profile] kalypso
I was only surprised he didn't suggest arming toddlers.

(no subject)

Date: 2012-12-22 11:02 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kalimac.livejournal.com
Alas, reality has outstripped satire. Again.

A case recently of an American football player who went crackers and killed his girlfriend in their home before driving to his team's facility and killing himself in front of his coach. First it was suggested that the girlfriend could have saved herself if only she'd had a gun. Then it turned out that she had several, and was trained in using them. So then the criticism became that she didn't have one on her person and ready for use at all times. Including at home. In front of her boyfriend. Just in case he went crackers.

(no subject)

Date: 2012-12-22 11:17 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] steepholm.livejournal.com
The Curse of Lehrer strikes again, I guess.

(no subject)

Date: 2012-12-22 11:29 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cmcmck.livejournal.com
Their solution to school shootings?

An armed police officer in every school in the land.........

A clue, they needz one! :oS

(no subject)

Date: 2012-12-22 01:43 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mevennen.livejournal.com
On FB, a US teacher said that she would prefer not to be armed - the other suggestion was that every teacher should carry a gun. To which the reply from another mum was that is that case, she'd arm her kid.

I read about 2 paragraphs of this before I realised it was satirical.

(no subject)

Date: 2012-12-22 01:50 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] steepholm.livejournal.com
As [livejournal.com profile] calimac says above, it's hard to keep up with reality! Though it's true I was going for a "Modest Proposal"-style slow burn.

(no subject)

Date: 2012-12-22 12:14 pm (UTC)
ext_90289: (Dragons)
From: [identity profile] adaese.livejournal.com
Is this a good place to float my helpful suggestion? The 2nd amendment is widely defended as protecting the People from a tyrannous government, by ensuring that all those wicked politicians are suitably afraid of the mob. This means making sure that the people are better armed than the police and army, at all times.

However, the same effect could be achieved by removing all metal detectors, bullet proof glass and so on from government buildings. Make it easier to assassinate any politician you don't like, and then the point at which your children are better defended than your elected representatives becomes much lower.

On a more serious note, it was widely reported when George W Bush was invited to stay at the palace that some of his security people had very helpfully suggested ways in which Buckingham Palace could be made bomb-proof for the occasion. I have always understood that the Queen, like her parents before her, took a certain pride in the fact that it wasn't bomb-proof, and I for one share that pride.

(no subject)

Date: 2012-12-22 12:44 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] steepholm.livejournal.com
This certainly seems a feasible plan. On a similar note, I've often wondered whether American football players would need all that protective padding, helmets and so on, if their opponents weren't also togged up in protective padding, helmets and so on. Remove that carapace, and behold - you have a rugby player, just as God intended.

(no subject)

Date: 2012-12-22 01:00 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kalimac.livejournal.com
There's also been a defensive arms race in American football padding, particularly noticeable in the face bars in the front of helmets. Kickers, who used to have a single nominal bar to prevent being hit in the face by a stray ball, now have the kind of carapace that used to be thought suitable for linebackers, and what the linebackers now have ...

(no subject)

Date: 2012-12-22 11:37 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tekalynn.livejournal.com
If you look at gridiron football players from the early to mid-twentieth century, you'll see that they're far more lightly armored than their modern-day counterparts. The intense and deliberate tackling of gridiron football led (and leads!) to serious skull injuries, hence the greater use of padding and reinforcement over time.

I've heard that rugby players aim for the shoulder when they tackle, gridiron players aim more for the head. This right there would show why the injury results are so different, and why one game requires more protection.

(Now, whether or not it makes a damn lick of sense to tackle that way is another question.)

(no subject)

Date: 2012-12-22 11:58 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ethelmay.livejournal.com
There is more and more evidence that American football players are suffering brain damage (chronic traumatic encephelopathy) that may show up decades later, often mimicking Alzheimer's or Lewy Body dementia. My stepmother's first husband was a brilliant football player at the University of Wisconsin (a major college team) in the 1940s, when helmets were hardly more than stiff balaclavas, and he ended up with what was supposed to be Alzheimer's but I have always suspected was brain damage.

(no subject)

Date: 2012-12-22 01:03 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kalimac.livejournal.com
Considering the nature and method of delivery of the bomb that actually did explode on Buckingham Palace on one famous occasion, I wonder what it would take to make it bomb-proof. A dome?

(no subject)

Date: 2012-12-22 06:20 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wellinghall.livejournal.com
Making the whole of Buckingham Palace bomb-proof would probably be impossible. But making parts of it bomb-proof would be a lot easier.

(no subject)

Date: 2012-12-22 01:36 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sartorias.livejournal.com
And here I thought that ratbastard thought you have sex WITH the gun, the bigger and more loaded the better. Because as everyone knows, civilians need automatic heavy-load weapons.

(no subject)

Date: 2012-12-22 01:51 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] steepholm.livejournal.com
It's the heart-rending way he said "the most beloved, innocent and vulnerable members of the American family — our children!" that made me reach for the sick bag.

(no subject)

Date: 2012-12-22 02:15 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sartorias.livejournal.com
You and a commentator on TV last night, who was so moved by that very phrase that he unlimbered a fulsome rodomontade against the scumsucker that had us all hooting and clapping. I swear he didn't stop for twenty minutes solid.

(no subject)

Date: 2012-12-22 02:26 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] steepholm.livejournal.com
That I'd love to see! If you ever see a link, let me know.

(no subject)

Date: 2012-12-22 02:31 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sartorias.livejournal.com
I'll try to remember to ask the spouse what show it was, and see if maybe there is a link.

(no subject)

Date: 2012-12-22 05:54 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] diceytillerman.livejournal.com
Might it have been Lawrence O'Donnell? I was truly half in love in love with him for his furious bitterness during his tirade last night.

(no subject)

Date: 2012-12-22 06:00 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sartorias.livejournal.com
Yes! Wasn't he magnificent? The only one I follow consistently is Rachel Maddow, but I was glad I caught this one.

(no subject)

Date: 2012-12-22 06:02 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] diceytillerman.livejournal.com
He was phenomenal. And I figured out how to link it for steepholm, below.

(no subject)

Date: 2012-12-22 07:15 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] steepholm.livejournal.com
I've watched it now - very good indeed! Thanks for alerting me to it.

(no subject)

Date: 2012-12-22 06:00 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] diceytillerman.livejournal.com
In fact, whether or not it was Lawrence O'Donnell, watch his anyway. Go here, and in the Latest Videos section, click on "The NRA breaks its silence." You'll have to see the show's intro first and then he goes into his tirade. Totally worth the 18 minutes.

(no subject)

Date: 2012-12-22 07:14 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] steepholm.livejournal.com
Thanks so much! That was absolutely worth it.

(no subject)

Date: 2012-12-22 04:48 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] veronica-milvus.livejournal.com
ooh, the irony, it burns! Nice job!

(no subject)

Date: 2012-12-22 05:26 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] steepholm.livejournal.com
Thank you! :)

(no subject)

Date: 2012-12-22 08:16 pm (UTC)
ext_9946: (Default)
From: [identity profile] forochel.livejournal.com
hello! you've just added me and I don't know why alskjgkekslkgjes (I mean this in a good, starry-eyed way) but omg and then I came to read your journal and ...

...huh??? this is so, so bizarre.

(no subject)

Date: 2012-12-22 08:24 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] steepholm.livejournal.com
Sorry - I should probably have introduced myself! But you replied to a post I left on the DIR community earlier, and I was just very taken with the idea of you flailing to yourself on Wayland's Smithy.

(no subject)

Date: 2012-12-22 08:29 pm (UTC)
ext_9946: (Default)
From: [identity profile] forochel.livejournal.com
I'm sure you know this already, but we had to walk a bit of the Ridgeway on the way to Wayland's Smithy and it was very entertaining to imagine that I was walking along one of the Old Ways. I do love how grounded in British geography The Dark is Rising is! Even though Cooper kind of stretches the space-time continuum in Wales/the Drew kids, Bran, and Will are all amazing walkers.

(no subject)

Date: 2012-12-22 08:41 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] steepholm.livejournal.com
I've done that stretch between the White Horse and the Smithy - and yes, it's an amazing place (I had it to myself on the day I was there, on account of the rain). I went to college three miles from Windsor Great Park, too, which made the snowy December of 1981 more than a little atmospheric.

Profile

steepholm: (Default)
steepholm

January 2026

S M T W T F S
    12 3
4567 8910
11 121314151617
1819 2021222324
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags