Abjection Sustained
Jul. 10th, 2013 04:52 pmI wonder why, of all diseases, cancer is the one most often characterized in terms of an alien entity, an invasive enemy one is expected to "fight"? People "beat" cancer or "lose their battle" with cancer, phrases far less often invoked with reference to, say, measles, botulism or pneumonia, even though all those conditions really are caused by alien entities, and their treatments involve massacring the little blighters by the thousand. Whereas most cancers, as I understand it, are merely our cellular selves gone haywire. Why do we (or at any rate the newspapers) turn to the language of the abject for their discussion? Is our bodies' betrayal so horrible to contemplate that we would rather think in terms of a siege than that the enemy is within the gates?
Laying these lugubrious thoughts firmly aside and turning to the Burlington Arcadia... I leave early tomorrow, and will be arriving at Logan around 7pm, so I doubt I'll be up to much socializing that night. But Friday, d.v., will find me perky, and probably pink too.
Laying these lugubrious thoughts firmly aside and turning to the Burlington Arcadia... I leave early tomorrow, and will be arriving at Logan around 7pm, so I doubt I'll be up to much socializing that night. But Friday, d.v., will find me perky, and probably pink too.
(no subject)
Date: 2013-07-10 04:22 pm (UTC)Have a lovely trip- we have to wait until September for our next lot of travels.
(no subject)
Date: 2013-07-10 04:41 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2013-07-10 06:09 pm (UTC)Are any of those as common to die from as cancer nowadays?
(I'm wondering if the rhetoric links to whatever is perceived as the greatest enemy of the human body at the time. Can you find references to "after a long battle with tuberculosis" or "influenza"?)
(no subject)
Date: 2013-07-10 06:13 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2013-07-10 06:51 pm (UTC)Several possibilities: it was a lengthy illness (or could be), so that counteracting it could assume the character of a "campaign"; there was a degree of patient involvement - they weren't generally lying unconscious; there wasn't a single cure (such as an antibiotic that would take it out), so much as a regimen requiring such soldierly qualities as discipline and perseverance.
(no subject)
Date: 2013-07-10 07:09 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2013-07-10 07:15 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2013-07-10 06:46 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2013-07-10 06:50 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2013-07-10 06:51 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2013-07-10 07:16 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2013-07-10 07:44 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2013-07-10 08:13 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2013-07-10 09:17 pm (UTC)The inherent danger in that language is that the "courageous" patient gamely "fights" the cancer and there is a subtle insinuation that if only he could try harder and fight more, he would "beat" it. And so people who die of cancer become morally inferior to those who survive.
In extreme cases, patients try so hard to "fight" with alternative therapies, positive mental attitudes and so on that they turn to conventional medicine far too late. There are people who say that's what happened to Steve Jobs.
(no subject)
Date: 2013-07-10 09:17 pm (UTC)Because s/he (I forget) was sick and tired of the implication that if they just fought hard enough, they could win! Flipside of that being, if they died, they hadn't made the effort...
This was particularly hard to take during chemo, being utterly at the mercy of the poison dripped in their veins, watching fellow patients die despite the best that medical science could do.
It was an astonishingly powerful piece - and as you can tell, has stayed with me, to the extent that I do my very best to avoid any such terminology, most especially when talking to patients.
(no subject)
Date: 2013-07-10 11:44 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2013-07-11 08:30 am (UTC)I shall continue to mind my language accordingly.
(no subject)
Date: 2013-07-11 10:05 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2013-07-11 10:14 am (UTC)Now hoping that won#t sound clueless and patronising but I am cis and thus reliant on my valued trans friends to teach me not to be clueless... so I'll just shut up and trust that you know what I mean... :-)
(no subject)
Date: 2013-07-11 11:02 am (UTC)And you clearly know enough not to say: 'but you are'.............:o)
(no subject)
Date: 2013-07-11 02:05 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2013-07-10 11:48 pm (UTC)So looking forward to seeing you again.
Travel well.
Nine
(no subject)
Date: 2013-07-11 09:03 am (UTC)