Hard-to-Google Lit. Crit. Queries...
May. 31st, 2014 12:37 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Is there a general term for novels (or other fictions) that contain/mention themselves? I mean, the novel is called The Book of Glum, and it's about someone who turns out to be writing or reading a book called The Book of Glum, or we're at least given to know that this is a world where The Book of Glum already exists?
Also, is there decent existing discussion (in journals or elsewhere) of this phenomenon?
Also, is there decent existing discussion (in journals or elsewhere) of this phenomenon?
(no subject)
Date: 2014-05-31 02:10 pm (UTC)Anyway, I'd suggest making a list of them - somewhere in print I have my old list - and looking up discussions of those individual books to see if anyone uses a name for the phenomenon.
(sorry, I keep thinking of more) There are detailed literary discussions of Tolkien's narrative voice, of who's supposed to be telling the tale and to whom, of which Verlyn Flieger's Interrupted Music is the most sophisticated, and I'm sure the same exists for other authors.
(and more) The most extensive example of recursiveness I can think of is one in which both referenced texts are 1) real and 2) cross-art. Tolstoy's story "The Kreutzer Sonata" is about a real Beethoven sonata known by that name, and Leos Janacek wrote a musical piece inspired by the Tolstoy story which he in turn also called "The Kreutzer Sonata"; confusingly, it's not a sonata but a string quartet.
(no subject)
Date: 2014-05-31 02:45 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2014-05-31 03:21 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2014-05-31 08:58 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2014-05-31 04:02 pm (UTC)As for your "recursive novel," the first one I think I ever read is Irving Wallace's The Seven Minutes, one of my earliest sources of sexual information. In it a novel called The Seven Minutes is put on trial for obscenity.
Then there are recursive novels that actually contain the novels that give them their titles. They're on the tip of my tongue, but the only thing that leaps to mind is Mark Strand's My Life, by Somebody Else.
(no subject)
Date: 2014-05-31 05:45 pm (UTC)Another book that actually contains, or largely consists of, the novel that gives it its title is the other one I mentioned in my first comment, The Princess Bride by William Goldman, which purports to be an abridgement of a novel by somebody else, to which Goldman has added (not overwhelmingly extensive) commentary.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2014-05-31 02:59 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2014-05-31 03:10 pm (UTC)Yes, "autoreferential" is certainly a possibility, if no more specific established term turns up.
(no subject)
Date: 2014-05-31 03:32 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2014-05-31 03:36 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2014-05-31 04:09 pm (UTC)Yes -- I've been looking for a term, or for some narratological account, of the very simple distinction between first person fictional worlds where what you read can be found (e.g. epistolary novels, journal novels, etc.) and where it can't. Sometimes you don't know you're in the former until late: e.g. Double Indemnity, The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night.
Also: A Hundred Years of Solitude.
And Javier Marías does this intertextually: (sometimes repeating) characters from his novels... interlexically read the novels other characters appear in, who read the novels they appear in.
I feel that John Sutherland might now the answer to this. He has a neat piece on stories where the author is mentioned as a minor character. Martin Amis has a novel where someone notices "that asshole Martin Amis" at another table. And Billy Pilgrim briefly runs into Kurt Vonnegut, Jr. In The Gunslinger a character has a weird experience that reminds him of "that movie The Shining," which of course Stephen King hated.
(no subject)
Date: 2014-05-31 07:09 pm (UTC)And there's also less precise distinction between epistolary/diary/etc. fictions where what you read can theoretically be found but in practice won't be because the letters (or whatever) are just a formal literary device, and those where the writings and/or their composition are a significant part of the plot. Again, this can shift from the first to the second quite late on. (Diana Wynne Jones's Black Maria is one example.) I'm trying to remember how far into Pamela Mr B. discovers P's letters - or did I misremember his doing so entirely?
I think that Amis novel was Money, wasn't it? And the speaker is John Self (lest we miss the point).
I think that E. Nesbit has a fairly transparent self-portrait in The Treasure Seekers, but I don't recall that she's actually named. However, in a slightly different part of the forest, the children in her House of Arden get interested in time travel because they've been reading her Story of the Amulet, published the previous year.
(no subject)
Date: 2014-05-31 07:26 pm (UTC)My interest is this: that it's vanishingly rare that a first person narrator can die (we assume she lives and are entitled to assume that), but not at all rare that you can have a concluding sentence such as this: "He made me promise I'd never tell a soul [the story just narrated], and that's a promise I intend to keep." Which may be true in the fictional world. So the ontology of the first person narrator is that if they're telling the story, they're alive in their world (or they couldn't tell it); but they're not necessarily telling it in their world. That's a strong convention, but not one that is necessary, so I am interested in the receptive psychology that makes it feel so strong, makes it seem so inviolable.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2014-05-31 10:48 pm (UTC)Edward Eager's Seven-Day Magic is a book that supposedly creates itself as the children in it have their adventures, and winds up being the book that the reader is reading.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2014-06-01 07:12 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2014-05-31 07:29 pm (UTC)Mark Twain too, I bet. Hm, Huckleberry Finn introduces his book by mentioning Twain and criticizing Tom Sawyer.
(no subject)
Date: 2014-05-31 07:46 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2014-05-31 07:51 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2014-05-31 05:06 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2014-05-31 07:10 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2014-05-31 05:50 pm (UTC)I started wondering about TV Tropes because I was thinking about "Extras", which is so recursive it makes my head hurt.
(no subject)
Date: 2014-05-31 06:44 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2014-05-31 07:17 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2014-06-01 09:54 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:Slightly beside the point but drifting along joyously...
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2014-06-05 09:24 pm (UTC)