steepholm: (Default)
[personal profile] steepholm
1. Everyone agreed that it would be impossible to defeat IS by attacking them in Iraq but leaving them alone in Syria.
2. There was a large majority in favour of attacking IS in Iraq and leaving them alone in Syria.

Did I miss anything?

(no subject)

Date: 2014-09-27 08:07 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] karinmollberg.livejournal.com
...it's a coded message because they are reading in? Like der Spiegel magazine publishing the exact inadequacy of their country's military equipment; something like that. Only logickal!

(no subject)

Date: 2014-09-27 09:30 am (UTC)
ext_9946: (Default)
From: [identity profile] forochel.livejournal.com
*buries face in hands*

(no subject)

Date: 2014-09-28 04:53 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gonzo21.livejournal.com
I think there was also an understanding that IS could not be defeated by air power alone.

And then a general agreement that we would only deploy air power.

(no subject)

Date: 2014-09-28 06:54 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] steepholm.livejournal.com
That is very true. How could I have omitted that canny piece of statecraft?

(no subject)

Date: 2014-09-30 01:17 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gonzo21.livejournal.com
I was amused by the story today that shockingly the IS fighters have stopped standing around in the middle of the desert wearing black robes and carrying 'please bomb me' signs, and have instead disappeared into towns and villages to avoid allied airstrikes.

Those cunning bastards.

(no subject)

Date: 2014-09-30 03:07 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] steepholm.livejournal.com
Do the Marquess of Queensbury rules mean nothing to these people?

(no subject)

Date: 2014-09-30 03:40 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gonzo21.livejournal.com
I'll wager the blighters refuse to don proper uniforms next.

Profile

steepholm: (Default)
steepholm

July 2025

S M T W T F S
  12345
67891011 12
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags